Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"On Indonesian Judicial Commission and its role in implementation of the judicial ethics in Indonesian legal system."

"Berdasar putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 005/PUU-IV/2006 , sejumlah pasal berkenaan dengan fungsi pengawasan Komisi Yudisial

---

"

"Yudisial power is free and independent in nature (Yudisial Independence). It is arranged in both the constitution and tire law. The judge in hearing and deciding a case must be free, objective and neutral. The judge must be free of any influences, including the influence of executive and legislative. The separation of Yudisial institution from the Department of Justice (executive) may result in concern that the Supreme Court (judicative) will became a party controlling indicative power (a tyranny). To prevent it from happening, a Komisi Yudisial is established as an independent institution (external control), whose function is to supervise and develop the judges (checks and balances). Many countries in the world already have a Komisi Yudisial, using different names. In addition to maintaining the standard and the value of judges, Komisi Yudisial also serves to recruit the judges of the Supreme Court."

"AbstrakReformasi telah melahirkan amandemen UUD 1945, salah satu hasilamandemen ke 3 UUD 1945 adalah lahirnya Komisi Yudisial (KY).Kedudukan Komisi Yudisial ini sangat penting, sehingga secara strukturalkedudukannya diposisikan sederajat dengan Mahkamah Agung dan MahkamahKonstitusi. Namun, secara fungsional, perannya bersifat penunjang (auxiliary)terhadap lembaga kekuasaan kehakiman. Komisi ini hanya berurusan denganpersoalan kehormatan, keluhuran martabat, dan perilaku hakim, bukan denganlembaga peradilan atau lembaga kekuasaan kehakiman secara institusional.Selain itu Komisi Yudisial juga tidak terlibat dalam hal organisasi, personalia,administrasi dan keuangan para hakim. Hal ini berbeda dengan Komisi Yudisialyang ada di negara Eropa. Kedepan Komisi Yudisial Indonesia perlumengadopsi atau meniru Komisi Yudisial yang ada di Eropa dan disesuaikandengan sistem peradilan Indonesia."

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas fungsi pengawasan Komisi Yudisial terhadap hakim diIndonesia, dari sudut pandang politik hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakanadalah metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum,pendekatan sejarah dan pendekatan hermeunetik. Hasil penelitian inimenunjukkan bahwa gagasan fungsi pengawasan Komisi Yudisial terhadap hakimdalam proses perubahan UUD 1945 dimaksudkan sebagai bentuk pengawasaneksternal atas perilaku hakim dan hakim agung dalam penyelenggaraan peradilan.Sedangkan di berbagai negara, baik negara common law dan civil law, dalamkonstitusinya memberikan fungsi kepada lembaga khusus untuk melakukanpengawasan terhadap hakim, atas dasar perilaku dan ketidakmampuan dalammenjalankan tugas. Di masa yang akan datang, perlu dilakukan pengaturan yanglebih mendetail terkait dengan konsep pengawasan Komisi Yudisial terhadaphakim di Indoensia. Selain itu, jika merujuk pada pengaturan fungsi pengawasanKomisi Yudisial pada berbagai negara, baik civil law maupun common law, padanantinya Komisi Yudisial diharapkan dapat melakukan fungsi pengawasanterhadap keseluruhan hakim, baik hakim dan hakim ad hoc di Mahkamah Agungdan badan peradilan, serta Hakim Konstitusi.

---

ABSTRACTThe focus study of this thesis is the oversight function on the judicial commissionagainst judges in Republic of Indonesia from a political point of view of law. Thisresearch is a normative research that use comparative, hictorical, and hermeuneticapproach. These results indicate that the idea of oversight functions of the JudicialCommission of the judges in the process of changing the Constitution of 1945intended as a form of external control over the behavior of judges and justices inthe administration of justice. While in many countries, both state common law andcivil law, the constitution provides functions to specialized agencies to carry outsupervision of the judge, on the basis of the behavior and inability to performtasks. In the future, need to be carried out more detailed arrangements relating tothe concept of supervision of the Judicial Commission of the judges in Indonesia.In addition, when referring to the various countries, both civil law and commonlaw, the Judicial Commission will be expected to perform the function of theoverall supervision of judges, both judges and ad hoc judges in the Supreme Courtand judicial bodies, as well as the Constitutional Court"