Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Administration and procedure of administrative courts in Indonesia."

"Tesis ini merupakan kajian yang hendak melihat konsep lembaga yang berwenang dalam sebuah proses peradilan. Relevansi antar lembaga sebagaimana dimaksud yaitu Komisi Informasi dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara adalah berwenang dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa keterbukaan informasi publik. tujuan daripada keterbukaan informasi publik adalah dalam rangka mengawal kebebasan informasi sebagai falsafah Hak Asasi Manusia dalam generasi ketiga. Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teori Hukum, teori Politik Hukum Nasional, Teori Pembagian Kekuasaan dan Kekuasaan Keempat, kerangka konsep yang digunakan yaitu peradilan administrasi dalam perspektif politik hukum dan Kebebasan atas informasi sebagai HAM. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukan bahwa komisi informasi ditempatkan layaknya peradilan tingkat pertama karena hasil dari putusan dapat dimintakan banding kepada PTUN, dalam proses di PTUN menggunakan hukum acara tersendiri yang menempatkan PTUN sebagai peradilan Banding. atas hasil penelitian maka terdapat suatu paradigma baru dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Gagasan yang diambil dari penelitian adalah dengan mengkonsolidasikan sistem penyelesaian sengketa informasi publik dalam peradilan khusus dibawah PTUN, Konsep demikian digunakan agar dapat mengawal dan memperkuat sistem hukum dan peradilan di Indonesia.

---

This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy, Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective and freedom of information as a human rights.

Results of the research showed that the commission of information like first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia."

"This paper aims to discuss problematizations of discretion issue in the Administration Law 2014. Discretion is one of some discussed issues in the Administration Law which provides a legal guidance for bureaucrats to conduct their jobs. Drawing on Bacchi's WPR (What is problem represented to be?] approach to policy analysis, this paper interrogates what 'problemfs]' is (are] produced in the policy document, what presuppositions are used as arguments to support the 'problems', what left as unproblematic issue that is absence in the policy problematizations, and what effects are produced by the 'problem' representation. The paper finds out that rules and procedures are the key concepts which assumed as policy 'problems' related to discretion issue. Neglecting the certain rules and procedures will be considered as doing illegal action. Only public managers have the discretionary power or managerial discretion, but in a limited room, because of upper manager's intervention. However, this discretion policy remains an inefficient and rigid process in facing certain situation because, in exercising discretion, they have to obey certain rules and procedures. In addition, staffs do not have discretionary authority within their jobs although they might also face some certain situation which needs to make decisions."

"Upaya penagqulangan kejahatan merupakan masalah universal yang terus menerus harus selalu diupayakan. Oleh karena itu dibutuhkan keterpaduan antara komponen-komponen yang terlibat dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang diatur diatur dan di tata dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana atau KUHAP. KUHAP sejak kelahirannya sangat menjunjung tinggi hak-hak tersangka atau terdakwa tanpa bertujuan secara khusus melindungi hak korban kejahatan. Terjadi ketidak seimbangan dalam perlakuan yang wajar antara tersangka atau terdakwa dengan korban kejahatan di dalam KUHAP. Masyarakat, terutama korban kejahatan sangat mendambakan keadilan dengan dipidananya pelaku kejahatan, sangat membutuhkan akses dalam penyelenggaraan peradilan. Masyarakat berhak tahu sampai sejauh mana perkembangannya penanganan perkara yang ditangani oleh aparat penegak hukum. Menyikapi hal tersebut penulis tertarik untuk mengambil permasalahan pokok dalam penelitian ini yaitu: "Bagaimana penerapan pemberian informasi tentang kemajuan penanganan perkara kepada korban dalam Lahap pra-adyudikasi". KUHAP tidak mengatur ketentuan pemberian informasi penanganan perkara oleh aparat penegak hukum. Sejak tahun 1985 dunia internasional telah menyepakati Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power. Di Indonesia telah lahir pula Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Dalam dua ketentuan ini telah diatur bahwa saksi dan korban berhak mendapatkan informasi perkembangan kasus. Penulis melakukan penelitian normatif dan empiris yang disajikan secara kualitatif, ternyata penegak hukum belum melaksanakan secara optimal dalam pelaksaan teknisnya di lapangan. Padahal pemberian informasi mengenai penanganan perkara ini sangat penting dan urgen untuk segera dilaksanakan dalam rangka pengawasan kinerja aparat penegak hukum serta kesuksesan proses peradilan pidana, sehingga rasa keadilan masyarakat dapat tercapai. Oleh karena itu diharapkan dalam rancangan KUHAP yang akan datang hal pemberian informasi kemajuan penanganan perkara ini perlu diatur lebih tegas.

---

The effort for overcoming crimes is a universal problem to be done continuously. Hence, it requires integration among components involved in the criminal justice system as legislated by Law No. 8/1981 of the Penal Code. Since the enactment, the penal code protect the rights of suspected or the accused more than to protect the right of victim of crime specially. Within the Penal Code there is no balance of proper treatment between the suspected or accused and the victim of crime. Society especially the victim of crime, they are very wishing justice by sentencing the offender and they need to access to courts. Society have right to know how far the progress of the case handled by the police and the prosecutor. Hence, the author in interest to write the essential problem for this research, i,e,: "How application of giving information regarding progress of the case in pre-adjudication stage". The Penal Code had not provided with regulation of giving information to settle case by police and prosecutor in pre-adjudication stage. Since the enactment of 1985 the World had agreed Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power. Also in Indonesia had been enacted Law No. 13/2006 of Protection for Witness and Victim(s). For those two instruments it had been regulated that 'witness and victims have right to get information about progress of the case. The author had conducted both normative and empirical research presented qualitatively, factually, the legal apparatus had not implemented its techniques in field optimally. Indeed, giving information about progress of the case is very urgent and important to be implemented immediately within framework of supervising the legal apparatus and to proceed criminal justice system successfully, so that, sense of justice of society may be achieved. Hence, it is wished to design The Penal Code for the future, giving information about progress of the case should be regulated more firmly."