Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKTesis ini berfokus pada eksistensi ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) di tengah trenbilateralisme kawasan Asia Tenggara. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untukmenganalisis strategi yang digunakan pemerintah negara-negara di kawasan AsiaTenggara dan negara-negara ekstra-regional khususnya Tiongkok dan AmerikaSerikat di ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). Aktor-aktor tersebut saling menjaga satusama lain untuk terlibat secara konstruktif di kawasan berbasis norma-normakooperatif yang dapat membantu mereka untuk mencapai kepentingan nasional danmencegah munculnya hegemoni intramural di wilayah Asia Pasifik. Penelitian inimenggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Selain itu, penelitian ini menggunakan kerangkaTeori Balance of Influence yang diwujudkan kedalam strategi Hedging untukmenganalisis fenomena yang terjadi. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa meskipunberada di tengah-tengah tren bilateralisme, aktor-aktor yang terlibat didalam ARFtetap mempertahankan forum ini karena model dialog dan penyelesaian ARF telahberhasil menjaga perimbangan kekuatan-kekuatan ekstra-regional di kawasan.

---

ABSTRACTThis research focuses on the existence of ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) within theBilateralism Trend in Southeast Asia. The purpose of this study was to analyze thestrategy of Southeast Asian governments and extra-regional powers used (especiallyChina and US) to keep each other constructively and cooperatively engaged in theregion and to promote rule and norm-based arrangements and principles that helpthem to achieve their national interest and deny intramural hegemony in the AsiaPacific region. This study used qualitative approach. In addition, this study uses theframework of Balance of Influence Theory that embodied into Hedging Strategy toanalyze the phenomenon that occurs. This study found that despite the bilateralismtrends, the actors that involved in the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) decided toretain this forum because its dialogue and settlement models have managed tomaintain the balance of extra-regional state power in Southeast Asia., This research focuses on the existence of ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) within theBilateralism Trend in Southeast Asia. The purpose of this study was to analyze thestrategy of Southeast Asian governments and extra-regional powers used (especiallyChina and US) to keep each other constructively and cooperatively engaged in theregion and to promote rule and norm-based arrangements and principles that helpthem to achieve their national interest and deny intramural hegemony in the AsiaPacific region. This study used qualitative approach. In addition, this study uses theframework of Balance of Influence Theory that embodied into Hedging Strategy toanalyze the phenomenon that occurs. This study found that despite the bilateralismtrends, the actors that involved in the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) decided toretain this forum because its dialogue and settlement models have managed tomaintain the balance of extra-regional state power in Southeast Asia.]"

"ABSTRAKTesis ini merupakan sebuah langkah analisa yang ditempuh untukmenganalisa mengapa postur pertahanan Indonesia mengalami stagnasi atau tidak merespon perubahan lingkungan strategis di kawasan Asia Tenggara periode 2001-2004. Analisa penelitian ini menggunakan konsep lingkungan strategis untuk menjelaskan perubahan lingkungan strategis di kawasan Asia Tenggara dan teori postur pertahanan ofensif-defensif untuk menjelaskan pengaruh doktrin pertahanan Indonesia yang inward-looking terhadap pengembangan posturpertahanan Indonesia periode 2001-2004. Analisa tesis ini akan menjadi sebuah bentuk penelitian eksplanatif yang dilakukan untuk melihat pola hubungan antarvariabel: dependen dan independen atau interaksi sebab-akibat antarvariabel: dependen dan independen, yang digunakan untuk menjawab pertanyaan penelitian analisa yang bersifat eksplanatif sebagai bentuk refleksi terhadap kenyataanrealitas sosial. Tesis ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa dan menjawab pertanyaan penelitian dan membuktikan hipotesa bahwa stagnasi postur pertahanan disebabkan cara pandang doktrin pertahanan Indonesia yang masih inward-looking. Uji hipotesa diperkuat dengan berbagai temuan data, seperti kebijakan global Amerika Serikatpasca pemboman gedung WTC dan ancaman terorisme global dan regional, konflik klaim teritorial dan kepentingan politik yang mengarah pada terjadinya potensi perselisihan kepentingan atas wilayah laut. Potensi konflik tersebut memicu sikap negara-negara di kawasan, mengembangkan kemampuan militer. Di sisi lain, cara pandang doktrin pertahanan Indonesia yang inward-lookingberimplikasi terhadap stagnasi pengembangan postur pertahanan. Stagnasi terlihat pada pengembangan kekuatan alutsista Indonesia yang tidak didukung oleh besaran alokasi anggaran pertahanan, orientasi pengembangan kekuatan militer sama sekali tidak menyentuh pada akuisisi alutsista yang mendukung dalam melakukan operasi militer keluar batas nasional, implementasi gelar pasukan yangtidak ditempatkan pada wilayah-wilayah penting dan tidak didukung kualitas dan kuantitas divisi, dan kemampuan diplomasi Indonesia yang sama sekali tidak beranjak pada fungsi diplomasi pertahanan untuk memperkuat sistem pertahanan dan keamanan negara yang diarahkan untuk melindungi kedaulatan wilayah dan usaha balancing untuk mencapai tujuan-tujuan politik di kawasan.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis is a kind of research to analyze and to answer the research question of why did Indonesia?s defense postur modernization run into stagnation or not respon the dynamic and alternation of strategic environment in 2001-2004?. Analysis of this thesis deploys strategic environment concept to analyze thedynamic and the alternation of strategic environment in Southeast Asia and defense postur of defensif-ofensif theory to analyze and to explain the inwardlooking point of view of military doctrine influencing stagnation of Indonesia?s defence postur modernization in 2001-2004. Analysis of this thesis is a kind of eksplanatif research. This research is a picture of Indonesia?s inward-looking military doctrine influencing stagnation of its defence posture and empirical condition of strategic environmentas, done to analyze, identify, and explain factorand indicator, which are directed to explain empirical condition and theoretical understanding.Analysis of strategic environment and point of view of military doctrineinfluencing defence postur modernization will be done to explain interaction patterns between independent and dependent variables, which are used to answer research question and to prove hypothesis of this analysis. Hypothesis of thisanalysis is supported by data which explain the global policy done by United States of America and the existence of global dan regional terrorism. In regional, there are conflict of territorial and clash of interest about sea territorial valueamong states. These conflict and clash trigger most of states in region to develop their military capability to respon situation. On the other side, there is inwardlooking point of view of Indonesia?s military doctrine influencing stagnation of its defense postur. The stagnation is pictured by very low defence budget and orientation of military equipment procurement which are not directed to support military operations outside of national territorial, including capability and quantity of manpower and divisions which are not supported by quantity and quality of military equipment, also the strategic deployment of manpower and divisions which not reflects the hotspot area, and the last, the capability of defense diplomacy which is not intended to create balancing strategy to increase Indonesia?s defense and security system."