Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Although these conflicts also have political, economic, and other causes, the purpose of this volume is to develop a psychological understanding of ethnic warfare. More specifically, Handbook of ethnopolitical conflict explores the function of ethnic, religious, and national identities in intergroup conflict. In addition, it features recommendations for policy makers with the intention to reduce or ameliorate the occurrences and consequences of these conflicts worldwide."

"Research related to the diversity and conflict in Indonesia to date concludes that ethnic fractionalization, as an indicator of diversity, is positively related to the level of conflict. However, this research has not included other indicators of diversity, namely ethnic polarization, which is considered better than ethnic fractionalization in explaining conflicts, especially identity conflicts. Using the National Violence Monitoring System (NVMS) data along with 2000 and 2010 Indonesia Census data, this study found that ethnic polarization and religious fractionalization contribute to the increase of identity conflict in Indonesia. Otherwise, there is no statistical proof that validates the positive relationship between ethnic fractionalization and the identity conflict in general. Furthermore, this study also shows that the degree of heterogeneity at district level significantly reduces some aspects of social outcomes, such as trust to non co ethnics, solidarity, participation in community, and perceived safety which act as a channel through which diversity affect identity conflict.

---

Penelitian terkait dengan keberagaman dan konflik di Indonesia hingga saat ini menyimpulkan apabila fraksionalisasi etnik, sebagai indikator dari keberagaman, berhubungan positif dengan tingkat konflik. Namun, penelitian tersebut belum memasukkan indikator lain dari keberagaman, yaitu polarisasi etnik, yang dianggap lebih baik daripada fraksionalisasi etnik di dalam menjelaskan konflik, khususnya konflik identitas. Dengan menggunakan data dari Sistem Nasional Pemantauan Kekerasan dan data keberagaman dari Sensus Penduduk tahun 2000 dan 2010, ditemukan apabila polarisasi etnik dan fraksionalisasi agama, berkontribusi terhadap peningkatan konflik identitas. Sebaliknya, tidak ditemukan bukti statistik yang dapat menjelaskan hubungan antara fraksionalisasi etnik dan konflik identitas secara umum. Selain itu, studi ini juga menemukan apabila tingkat keberagaman di suatu wilayah, berpengaruh negatif terhadap beberapa keluaran modal sosial seperti kepercayaan antar-etnis, solidaritas, partisipasi di komunitas, dan perasaan aman, yang berperan sebagai saluran yang menghubungkan keberagaman dengan konflik identitas."