Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Fokus penelitian ini adalah untuk menemukan penerapan karakter “surrealis” dalam Arsitektur Vernakular Indonesia sebagai produk pemikiran bawah sadar berdasarkan definisi yang didefinisikan oleh para pencipta seni dan desainer Gerakan Surealisme pada tahun 1900-an. Dari masa pra hingga pasca masa keemasan gerakan surealisme hingga saat ini, dari pergeseran banyak gaya dan bentuk karya seni, definisi surealisme telah diguncang oleh keputusan bawah sadar, akar dari kesamaan dalam arsitektur vernakular didirikan dalam aspek sosial, budaya, dan topografi suatu keberadaan. Disuntikkan pada karya-karya manusia termasuk keluaran arsitektur, Menariknya Arsitektur Vernakular Indonesia menjadi salah satu arsitektur yang “eksplisit” menampilkan pemikiran pada gayanya. Dipimpin oleh Tongkonan Toraja, tulisan ini akan menganalisis implementasi karakter surealis dalam Arsitektur Vernakular Indonesia dengan menghubungkannya dengan gagasan yang didirikan.

---

The focus of this study is to find the applications of “surrealist” characters in Indonesian Vernacular Architecture as a product of subconscious thinking based on their definition defined by the Surrealism Movement in the 1900s’ creators of arts and designers. From pre- to post-golden age of surrealism movement until the present times, from the shift of many styles and forms of artworks, the definition of surrealism has founded to be bed rocked by subconscious decisions, the roots of the similarities in vernacular architecture founded in the aspect of social, cultural, and topography of one existence. Injected to the works of human beings including architectural output, Indonesian Vernacular Architecture interestingly being one to “explicitly” show the thinking to the style. Leads by Toraja’s Tongkonan, this writing will analyze the implementation of the surrealist characters form Indonesian Vernacular Architectures by connecting them with the idea founded."

"In her research Yulia Nurliani Lukito analyses modernity and the construction of culture by the authorities using the images of Indonesian vernacular architecture presented at three different sites and times. She argues that modernity is not solely constructed by the authorities, rather it is an ongoing process modified by visitors of exhibitions. Pasar Gambir was a laboratory of modernity for the colony, and an important stage in modernizing and negotiating cultural and social conditions in the colony. The Dutch Pavilion at the 1931 colonial exhibition became a moment when the Indies heritages played a role in marking colonial territory. Modern ethnographic park of Taman Mini gives a way to the making of an official 'authentic' culture and suppresses the previous Dutch construction of the Indies culture. Contents · Pasar Gambir of Batavia: Hybrid Architecture and Space of Encounter for the Indies People · The Dutch Pavilion at the 1931 International Colonial Exhibition in Paris: Contrasting Authenticity and Modernity · Taman Mini Indonesia Indah: the Rebirth of Indonesian Vernacular Architecture after Independence Target Groups · Lecturers and students of the social sciences especially in history and theory of architecture · Readers who are interested in cultural studies, architecture, history, and modernity The Author Yulia Nurliani Lukito received her doctorate degree in Theory of Architecture from RWTH Aachen. Her research interests are theory and history of architecture, modernity, and Indonesian vernacular architecture. "