Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 3841 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Chambers, Iain
London: Routledge, 2001
190.904 CHA c
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
New York: Routledge, 1993
121 QUE
Buku Teks SO  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Jasbir, Jain
London: Sage, 2011
305.42 JAS i
Buku Teks SO  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
New York: Routledge, 1995
340. 115 AFT
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
cover
Hirsch, Marianne
New York: Columbia University Press, 2012
940.531 8 HIR g
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
"Affect, Emotion and Subjectivity in Early Modern Muslim Empires presents new approaches to Ottoman Safavid and Mughal art and culture. Taking artistic agency as a starting point, the authors consider the rise in status of architects, the self-fashioning of artists, the development of public spaces, as well as new literary genres that focus on the individual subject and his or her place in the world. They consider the issue of affect as performative and responsive to certain emotions and actions, thus allowing insights into the motivations behind the making and, in some cases, the destruction of works of art. The interconnected histories of Iran,Turkey and India thus highlight the urban and intellectual changes that defined the early modern period. "
Leiden, The Nederlands: Koninklijke Brill nv, 2018
e20497889
eBooks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Ajanti Trijanuary
"Tren cancel culture saat ini telah menjadi topik yang mengundang banyak perdebatan di media sosial. Yang dimaksud dari tren cancel culture adalah sebuah konsep bahwa seorang individu atau kelompok dapat “dibatalkan” atau “disingkirkan” akibat memiliki perilaku bermasalah yang tidak dapat diterima oleh publik (Mayasari, 2022). Pada topik penelitian ini, penulis mengakarkan permasalahan pada pertanyaan mengapa dominasi pandangan subjektif dapat mengindikasikan bahwa tren cancel culture termasuk ke dalam satu bentuk baru dari budaya perundungan. Subjektivitas pada tren cancel culture ini nyatanya berperan besar pada asumsi bahwa cancel culture merupakan satu bentuk baru dari budaya perundungan. Hal tersebut menyatakan bahwa dominasi pandangan subjektif individu tidak seharusnya menjadi upaya untuk menghasilkan output yang objektif sebab dapat mengesampingkan aspek logis dalam menilai individu lain dan mengindikasikan hadirnya hasrat kebencian di dalam pandangan subjektif tersebut. Banyak dijumpai masyarakat yang didapati memiliki intensi kebencian (dalam konteks rasial ataupun non-rasial) kepada korban dari tren cancel culture dan hal tersebut dianggap inheren dengan budaya perundungan. Seperti pada beberapa kasus cancel culture yang diterapkan kepada beberapa tokoh publik seperti Gofar Hilman, Kim Seon Ho, dan Johnny Depp yang sama-sama memiliki pola kejadian serupa. Maka dari itu, penelitian ini berupaya untuk melahirkan kesadaran akan dominasi keberadaan subjektivitas yang nyatanya menghasilkan kepercayaan objektif yang buruk dengan hadirnya tren cancel culture sebagai sebuah bentuk budaya perundungan yang baru. Penulis menjadikan teori ketidakadilan epistemik atau epistemic injustice yang digagas oleh Miranda Fricker (1966), seorang filsuf Inggris, yang menegaskan pemikirannya pada ketidakadilan epistemik yang bersumber dari konsep ketidakadilan yang dilakukan agen penahu terhadap seseorang. Dominasi subjektivitas yang terdapat pada tren cancel culture ini membawa penulis pada analisis mengenai adanya ketidakadilan epistemik yang terdapat dalam subjektivitas tersebut.

The current cancel culture trend has become a topic that invites a lot of debate on social media. What is meant by the cancel culture trend is a concept that an individual or group can be “canceled” or “removed” due to having problematic behavior that is unacceptable to the public (Mayasari, 2022). On this research topic, the authors root the problem on the question why the dominance of subjective views can indicate that the cancel culture trend is included in a new form of bullying culture. The subjectivity of the cancel culture trend actually plays a major role in the assumption that cancel culture is a new form of bullying culture. This states that the domination of individual subjective views should not be an effort to produce objective outputs because it can override the logical aspect of judging other individuals and indicates the presence of a desire for hatred in that subjective view. There are many people who are found to have hateful intentions (in a racial or non-racial context) towards victims of the cancel culture trend and this is considered to be inherent in a culture of bullying. As in several cases of cancel culture which was applied to several public figures such as Gofar Hilman, Kim Seon Ho, and Johnny Depp who both had a similar pattern of incidents. Therefore, this research seeks to raise awareness of the domination of subjectivity which in fact produces bad objective beliefs with the presence of the cancel culture trend as a new cultural form of bullying. The author makes the theory of epistemic injustice initiated by Miranda Fricker (1966), a British philosopher, who emphasizes her thoughts on epistemic injustice originating from the concept of injustice perpetrated by a knowledge agent against someone. The dominance of subjectivity in the cancel culture trend brings the author to an analysis of the existence of epistemic injustice in that subjectivity."
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia, 2023
MK-pdf
UI - Makalah dan Kertas Kerja  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
"In the aftermath of the Second World War, both the allied occupying powers and the nascent German authorities sought Germans whose record during the war and the Nazi period could serve as a counterpoint to the notion of Germans as evil. That search has never really stopped. In the past few years, we have witnessed a burgeoning of cultural representations of this "other" kind of Third Reich citizen - the "good German" - as opposed to the committed Nazi or genocidal maniac. Such representations have highlighted individuals' choices in favor of dissenting behavior, moral truth, or at the very least civil disobedience. The "good German's" counterhegemonic practice cannot negate or contradict the barbaric reality of Hitler's Germany, but reflects a value system based on humanity and an "other" ideal community. This volume of new essays explores postwar and recent representations of "good Germans" during the Third Reich, analyzing the logic of moral behavior, cultural and moral relativism, and social conformity found in them. It thus draws together discussions of the function and reception of "Good Germans" in Germany and abroad. Contributors: Eoin Bourke, Manuel Bragança, Maeve Cooke, Kevin De Ornellas, Sabine Egger, Joachim Fischer, Coman Hamilton, Jon Hughes, Karina von Lindeiner-Strásky, Alexandra Ludewig, Pól O Dochartaigh, Christiane Schönfeld, Matthias Uecker. Pól O Dochartaigh is Professor of German and Dean of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Ulster, Northern Ireland. Christiane Schönfeld is Senior Lecturer in German and Head of the Department of German Studies at Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick."
United States: Boydell & Brewer, 2013
e20528267
eBooks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Hall, Donald E.
London: Routledge , 2004
809.933 5 HAL s
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
<<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   >>