Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Ide pembentukan Komunitas Politik Keamanan ASEAN APSC pada tahun 2015 merupakan perwujudan salah satu pilar dari Komunitas ASEAN. ASEAN Community Pembentukan komunitas keamanan ini merupakan suatu fenomena yang menarik karena komunitas ini dibentuk dalam suatu kawasan regional yang terdiri dari negara negara dengan kapabilitas militer yang cenderung serupa karena tidak terdapat hegemon regional di kawasan tersebut.Penelitian ini berfokus untuk menganalisis mengapa proses pematangan APSC diikuti oleh poliferasi senjata ofensif oleh negara negara anggota ASEAN Penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk menunjukkan keterkaitan antara proses pematangan Komunitas Politik Keamanan ASEAN APSC dengan dinamika persenjataan di Asia Tenggara serta seberapa besar tingkat interaksi antara kedua variabel tersebut.

---

The idea of the establishment of ASEAN Political Security Community APSC in 2015 is a manifestation of security pillar which is one of the pillars that support ASEAN Community The establishment of this security community is an interesting phenomenon as it is created in a region that consists of states with similar military capabilities as the region does not possess regional hegemon.This research focuses on the question why the maturation of ASEAN Political Security Community APSC is followed by the arms proliferation of ASEAN member states. It also explains the linkage between the maturation of APSC and the arms dynamics in Southeast Asia as well as the level of interaction among the two variables."

"[ABSTRAKTesis ini berfokus pada eksistensi ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) di tengah trenbilateralisme kawasan Asia Tenggara. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untukmenganalisis strategi yang digunakan pemerintah negara-negara di kawasan AsiaTenggara dan negara-negara ekstra-regional khususnya Tiongkok dan AmerikaSerikat di ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). Aktor-aktor tersebut saling menjaga satusama lain untuk terlibat secara konstruktif di kawasan berbasis norma-normakooperatif yang dapat membantu mereka untuk mencapai kepentingan nasional danmencegah munculnya hegemoni intramural di wilayah Asia Pasifik. Penelitian inimenggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Selain itu, penelitian ini menggunakan kerangkaTeori Balance of Influence yang diwujudkan kedalam strategi Hedging untukmenganalisis fenomena yang terjadi. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa meskipunberada di tengah-tengah tren bilateralisme, aktor-aktor yang terlibat didalam ARFtetap mempertahankan forum ini karena model dialog dan penyelesaian ARF telahberhasil menjaga perimbangan kekuatan-kekuatan ekstra-regional di kawasan.

---

ABSTRACTThis research focuses on the existence of ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) within theBilateralism Trend in Southeast Asia. The purpose of this study was to analyze thestrategy of Southeast Asian governments and extra-regional powers used (especiallyChina and US) to keep each other constructively and cooperatively engaged in theregion and to promote rule and norm-based arrangements and principles that helpthem to achieve their national interest and deny intramural hegemony in the AsiaPacific region. This study used qualitative approach. In addition, this study uses theframework of Balance of Influence Theory that embodied into Hedging Strategy toanalyze the phenomenon that occurs. This study found that despite the bilateralismtrends, the actors that involved in the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) decided toretain this forum because its dialogue and settlement models have managed tomaintain the balance of extra-regional state power in Southeast Asia., This research focuses on the existence of ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) within theBilateralism Trend in Southeast Asia. The purpose of this study was to analyze thestrategy of Southeast Asian governments and extra-regional powers used (especiallyChina and US) to keep each other constructively and cooperatively engaged in theregion and to promote rule and norm-based arrangements and principles that helpthem to achieve their national interest and deny intramural hegemony in the AsiaPacific region. This study used qualitative approach. In addition, this study uses theframework of Balance of Influence Theory that embodied into Hedging Strategy toanalyze the phenomenon that occurs. This study found that despite the bilateralismtrends, the actors that involved in the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) decided toretain this forum because its dialogue and settlement models have managed tomaintain the balance of extra-regional state power in Southeast Asia.]"

"In this third edition of Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia, Amitav Acharya offers a comprehensive and critical account of the evolution of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) norms and the viability of the ASEAN way of conflict management. Building on the framework from the first edition, which inspired the establishment the ASEAN Political-Security community, this new edition has been extensively updated and revised based on new primary sources that are not publicly available.Updates for this edition include:Expanded and updated coverage of the South China Sea Conflict and how it affects regional order and tests ASEAN unityAnalysis of new developments in US role in the region, including ASEAN's place and role in the US pivot/​rebalancing strategy and the evolution of the East Asian Community, the newest summit level multilateral groupExtensive analysis of the ASEAN Political-Security communityAn examination of US-China relations and China-ASEAN relationsCoverage of ASEAN's institutional development and the controversy over reform of the ASEAN Secretariat.An updated outlook on ASEAN's future as a security community and the issue of ASEAN Centrality in the regional security architecture. The new edition will continue to appeal to students and scholars of Asian security, international relations theory and Southeast Asian studies as well as policymakers and the media"

"Tugas karya akhir ini membahas mengenai proses regionalisasi Asia Selatan dilihat dari aspek keamanan, ekonomi dan politik internasional serta sosial budaya dalam SAARC. Pembahasan dalam tulisan ini bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran regionalisasi di negara berkembang, khususnya di kawasan Asia Selatan. Dengan menggunakan teori regionalisme, maka akan dianalisis tahap regionalisasi dari tiap aspek melalui keterlibatan indikator-indikator pendukung regionalisme, seperti kebijakan, common goal dan hasil faktualnya. Setelah itu, akan dilihat tingkat regionalisme dari tiap aspek melalui proses pelaksanaan kebijakannya. Hasil dari analisa tulisan ini memperlihatkan bahwa regionalisasi di aspek keamanan masih rendah, begitu pula di aspek ekonomi dan politik internasional. Di sisi lain, dengan melihat keterlibatan indikator-indikator pendukung menunjukkan aspek sosial budaya di SAARC memasuki tahap regionalisasi sedang.

---

This final assignment will discuss the process of regionalization in South Asia in the facets of security, international and political economy and social culture in SAARC. The aim of this paper is to give description about regionalization in developing countries, especially in South Asia region. This paper will use regionalism as the theory and analyze the level of regionalization from every facets through supporting indicators of regionalization. The supporting indicators will be the actors, policies, common goal and also the factual impacts. This paper will also analyze regionalization from the policies? implementation in SAARC. The result showed that regionalization in security aspect is still low, this is also happen in international and political economy. However, seeing through the supporting indicators of regionalization, level of regionalization in social culture of SAARC is in the middle."