Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The law of the sea is an important area of international law which must be able to adapt to the changing needs of the international community. Making the Law of the Sea examines how various international organisations have contributed to the development of this law and what kinds of instruments and law-making techniques have been used. Each chapter considers a different international institution ? including the International Maritime Organization and the United Nations ? and analyses its functions and powers. Important questions are posed about the law-making process, including what actors are involved and what procedures are followed. Potential problems for the development of the law of the sea are considered and solutions are proposed. In particular, James Harrison explores and evaluates the current methods employed by international institutions to coordinate their law-making activities in order to overcome fragmentation of the law-making process. Provides a sustained case study of international law-making; Gives a detailed analysis of the functions and powers of various international organizations involved in maritime law and policy; Details some of the development in the law of the sea since the conclusion of the Law of the Sea Convention in 1982."

"[Tesis ini membahas tentang unsur-unsur penting yang terdapat dalam Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) dan Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) serta tanggung jawab pidana individu yang dapat diterapkan dalam hybrid tribunals. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif analitis. Penulis menganalisa perbandingan antara ECCC dan SCSL sebagai hybrid tribunal dan dari hasil analisa tersebut ditemukan beberapa persamaan dan perbedaan dari kedua hybrid tribunal tersebut. Adapun persamaan diantara keduanya meliputi unsur-unsur yang digunakan dalam peradilan, antara lain instrumen hukum yang digunakan, komposisi hakim, jaksa dan pengacara. Selain itu juga, latar belakang berdirinya kedua hybrid tribunal tersebut memiliki kesamaan. Latar belakang tersebut antara lain tidak memadainya sumber daya di tingkat nasional, adanya hambatan dari sistem hukum domestik, tidak memadainya sistem hukum domestik dan ingin memberikan kontribusi terhadap hak, keadilan dan pengadilan yang efektif.

---

This thesis discusses the important elements contained in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) and also the criminal responsibility of individuals that can be applied in hybrid tribunals. This research uses descriptive analytical method. The author analyzes the comparison between the ECCC and SCSL as a hybrid tribunal and as the results of the analysis, the author found some similarities and differences of the two hybrid tribunal. The similarities between the two covering elements used in court, among other legal instruments are used, the composition of judges, prosecutors and lawyers. Also, the background of the establishment of the two hybrid tribunals have in common. These background include inadequate resources at the national level, the barriers of the domestic legal system, inadequate domestic legal system and the tribunal wishes to contribute to the rights, justice and effective court., This thesis discusses the important elements contained in the Extraordinary

Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) and the Special Court for Sierra

Leone (SCSL) and also the criminal responsibility of individuals that can be

applied in hybrid tribunals. This research uses descriptive analytical method. The

author analyzes the comparison between the ECCC and SCSL as a hybrid tribunal

and as the results of the analysis, the author found some similarities and

differences of the two hybrid tribunal. The similarities between the two covering

elements used in court, among other legal instruments are used, the composition

of judges, prosecutors and lawyers. Also, the background of the establishment of

the two hybrid tribunals have in common. These background include inadequate

resources at the national level, the barriers of the domestic legal system,

inadequate domestic legal system and the tribunal wishes to contribute to the

rights, justice and effective court]"