Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"GSO segment above the Indonesia area was ever claimed by Indonesia's Government under its sovereignty, but in the subsequent development its sovereignty claim was changed to the preservation right claim in the use to put satellite in a certain place. Ratification of the 1967 space treaty made by Indonesia could influential to the position of Indonesia against the claimed to the GSO segment. The juridical and comparative method was used to examination the data above, the data was examined qualitatively. From the examination's data could be concluded that after the ratification's Indonesia cannot based on the reason again that Indonesia did not bound the 1967 Space Treaty against the Indonesian's claims in the GOS segment. Although Indonesia still have an interest for the sake of use in the GSO segment, but the Indonesia has to implement the Space Treaty 1967 in its activities."

"Salah satu praktek dalam perbankan adalah adanya keberadaan jaminan/agunan di dalam melakukan perjanjian kredit. Dalam perkembangannya dalam melakukan pemberian kredit terdapat masalah saat ternyata agunan yang diberikan dalam proses perkreditan ternyata merupakan hasil dari tindak pidana yang menyebabkan terjadinya penyitaan untuk pengembalian kerugian negara. Penelitian ini mencoba menganalisis mengenai apakah penyitaan tersebut sesungguhnya dapat menghilangkan hak preferent maupun hak parate eksekusi yang dimiliki oleh bank sesaat setelah melakukan peletakan hak tanggungan terhadap asset yang dijadikan jaminan. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data sekunder atau bahan pustaka. Dari penilitian yang dilakukan dapat disimpulkan bahwa pada konsep hukumnya sendiri hak preferent dan hak parate eksekusi tidak dapat dirampas oleh negara karena adanya asas droit de suite dan droit de preferent, akan tetapi apabila terjadi perampasan yang dilakukan oleh negara maka hilanglah kedua hak tersebut karena walau dapat dimintakan kembali agunan tersebut tapi harus melawati proses yang panjang yang menghilangkan hak parate eksekusi maupun hak preferent. Maka dari itu penulis menyarankan seharusnya undang-undang lebih diperbaharui sehingga dapat lebih menjelaskan lagi mengenai agunan yang terbukti merupakan hasil tindak pidana. Serta penegak hukum yang melakukan penyitaan harusnya melakukan pemeriksaan terhadap benda yang akan disitanya, apakah diatas benda tersebut terdapat hak pihak ketiga yang dilindungi oleh Undang-undang.

---

In bankin practice making credit agreements there are existence of collateral. In its development in giving credit there was a problem when it turned out that the collateral provided in the credit process turned out to be the result of a criminal act that caused seizure of the object to recover state losses. This study attempts to analyze whether the confiscation can actually eliminate preferential right and parate execution right held by the bank shortly after placing the mortgage right on the assets that are used as collateral. Approach method used in this research is normative juridical with technique of collecting of secondary date or library material, which then analyzed by using qualitative method. From the research conducted, it can be concluded than in the legal concept the preferential right and parate execution right cannot be confiscated by the state beause the legal concept the preferential rights and parate execution rights cannot be confiscated by the state because the principle of droit de suite and droit de preferent, but if there is a seizure carried out by the state it meants then the two rights are lost because even if the bank can collect the collateral again but bank had to go through a long process that eliminated the parate execution and preferential rights. Therefore the authors suggest that the law should be renewed so that it can further explain about collateral which is proven to be the result of a criminal act. As well as law enforcers who carry out seizures should conduct an inspection of the objects before confiscated it, whether there are rights to the third party which are protected by law. "

"Liberalisasi di bidang pengadaan pemerintah masuk menjadi pembahasan negara maju dan berkembang dalam beberapa Persetujuan Perdagangan Internasional seperti Agreement on Government Procurement, Trans Pasific Partnership Agreement, dan European Union Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. Indonesia belum ikut serta dalam ketiga persetujuan diatas. Indonesia memiliki beberapa kepentingan nasional untuk ikut serta di dalam persetujuan diatas, namun keikutsertaan tersebut juga memiliki dampak negatif. Tesis ini membahas mengenai tiga hal yaitu kebijakan Indonesia mengenai Pengadaan Pemerintah, kepentingan nasional dalam ikut serta di Persetujuan Pengadaan Pemerintah, dan implikasi hukum apabila Indonesia nantinya ikut serta. Penulis menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yaitu metode berusaha menyelaraskan ketentuan hukum internasional dengan hukum nasional yang berlaku dalam bidang pengadaan pemerintah untuk menjawab permasalahan pada tesis. Indonesia belum membuka akses pasar bebas terhadap bidang pengadaan pemerintah untuk produk barang/jasa dari negara lain. Apabila Indonesia membuka akses pasar bebas dalam pengadaan pemerintah, terdapat beberapa hal baik dan buruk yang akan berdampak pada kepentingan nasional. Selain itu juga terdapat beberapa implikasi hukum yang akan terjadi. Indonesia bukan tidak mungkin untuk ikut serta dalam Persetujuan Pengadaan Pemerintah, namun untuk itu pemerintah wajib mempertimbangkan apakah keikut sertaan ini lebih banyak memberikan sesuatu yang baik untuk kepentingan nasional atau bahkan lebih banyak memberikan hal yang buruk. Pemerintah juga memerlukan kesiapan yang matang untuk menghadapi liberalisasi pengadaan pemerintah sehingga keikut sertaan ini tidak akan membawa kerugian semata bagi kepentingan nasional.

---

In these recent years, the topic of Government Procurement liberalization is being discussed by developed and developing countries on International Trade Agreement such as Agreement on Government Procurement, Trans Pasific Partnership Agreement, and European Union Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. Indonesia has not participated yet in the above three agreements. There are several national interests of Indonesia if Indonesia participate in the above agreements, but such participation also has a negative impact. This thesis discusses about three questions i.e. the Indonesian policy on Government Procurement, Indonesian national interest of participating the Government Procurement Agreements, and the legal implications in case Indonesia participate on Government Procurement Agreements. The author uses the normative juridical method in trying to harmonize the provisions of international law with the applicable national law in the field of government procurement to answer the questions appear on the thesis. Indonesia has not open yet a free market access to the goods services of the government procurement from other countries. If Indonesia opens a free market access in government procurement, there are some good and bad things that will affect the national interest. There are also some legal implications that will occur. For Indonesia, it is not impossible to participate in the Government Procurement Agreements, however to participate in the Government Procurement Agreements, Indonesian government must consider whether this participation is giving more good or even giving more bad things to the national interest. The government also needs a mature readiness to deal with the liberalization of government procurement so that this participation will not only bring harm to the national interest of Indonesia."