Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai Inspektorat Pengawasan dan Pemeriksaan Khusus Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN) dalam melaksanakan Investigasi pemeriksaan khusus, penegakan kode etik dan disiplin pegawai di lingkungan BNN dalam rangka Good Governance. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis Inspektorat Pengawasan dan Pemeriksaan Khusus dalam melaksanakan tugas dan fungsinya serta menganalisis bagaimana upaya mengatasi kendala-kendala yang dihadapi. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori Good governance dan konsep Sistem Pengendalian Internal (SPIP). Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah melalui pendekatan kualitatif. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini bahwa Inpektorat Pengawasan dan Pemeriksaan Khusus melalui tugas dan fungsinya berperan dalam mengatasi tiga dari sembilan kendala dalam mewujudkan good governance yaitu pelanggaran kode etik dan disiplin, pengalahgunaan wewenang, dan praktik Kolusi Korupsi dan Nepotisme yang diimplementasikan melalui pelaksanaan Audit Investigasi/Pemeriksaan Khusus, Audit Dengan Tujuan Tertentu (ADTT) serta Penegakan Kode Etik dan Disiplin. Disamping itu ditemukan pula kendala-kendala yang harus segera diatasi Inspektorat Pengawasan dan Pemeriksaan Khusus yaitu belum memiliki Standard Operational Procedure (SOP), dukungan pegawai masih sedikit dan belum memiliki kompetensi yang memadai, belum mengusulkan Daftar Susunan Pegawai, dan belum mengajukan rencana kebutuhan anggaran, rencana program kegiatan, serta belum dirumuskannya Indikator Kinerja Utama.

---

This study discusses about the Inspectorate of Special Supervision and Inspection of the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) in carrying out special investigation, code of ethics enforcement and discipline of BNN employees in the context of Good Governance. This study aims to analyze the Inspectorate of Special Supervision and Examination in carrying out its duties and analyzing how efforts to overcome the obstacles faced. This study uses the Good Governance and SPIP theory. The research method used a qualitative approach. The conclusion of this study is the Inpectorate of Special Supervision and Inspection through its duties plays a role in overcoming three of the nine obstacles in realizing good governance, namely violations of the code of ethics and discipline, abuse of authority, and practices of Collusion, Corruption and Nepotism. Besides that, there are also obstacles that must be addressed immediately by the Inspectorate of Special Supervision and Examination, which does not yet have a Standard Operational Procedure (SOP), employee support is still small and does not have adequate competence, has not proposed a List of Employee Arrangements, and has not yet proposed a budget plan. planned program activities, as well the formulation of the Main Performance Indicators."

"A good model government is government that has a high level of organizational effectiveness related to policy formulation and policy implementation in reality. Therefore bureaucracy development as an implementer instution in order to achieve governemnt objective is an imperative necessity...."

"This final assignment is observing about government system and institutions relationship in Indonesia, since Soeharto?s era until Reformation era. Its research is focused on presidentialism practice in Indonesia, study case of SBY-JK government (October 2004 ? March 2008). This objective study is based on the theories of presidentialism, democracy, political party, and presidential leadership especially in the third world with qualitative literature approach.Executive and legislative institution in Indonesia, had a dynamic relationship since Soeharto?s era. That situation made a problem in presidentialism practice. Within Soeharto?s power, new order era succeed to make executive heavy on the system. It means, Soeharto controlled the government system and became a centralistic of authority. On the other hand, legislative was powerless. This executive heavy caused dissatisfaction on the accountability, transparency, and mandate for the people. President is voted by legislative but in practical, executive was so powerful. Many people had realized then, if there were a disappointment on the government and political practice for 32 years of Soeharto?s era. After that, General economic distress was happened on 1997 in Indonesia within global monetary crisis. In addition, the government was controlled by corruption, collusion, and nepotism politician. As a result, people pushed the reform in 1998.Reformation 1998, has made a renewal in institutional relationship between executive, legislative, and judicative, especially President - House of Representative. With amendment UUD 1945, liberalization of political parties was occurred, House of Representative?s authority has been empowered, and all of the problems were started to be fixed. In the next four generation of President (B.J. Habibie, Gus Dur, Megawati, SBY), Indonesia had implemented those reform, but still adjusted. Until the election in 2004 and almost 10 years, reformation still has had a problem in presidentialism practice.The election in 2004 (within separated election and multiparty) was the new era for President who would be more powerful because of the direct election, but on the contrary, the combination between presidentialism and multiparty was a complicated combination. President faced with coalition party, minority president, and cohabitation in executive leadership. The fact, SBY-JK controls the government with weak management/policy and leadership of SBY-JK inside. So that, many problems which are faced by the government cannot be solved effectively/efficiently, at least during this research is being done."

"Empiris rondirion manifest similar nomenclature of Plered Village at Cirebon , Plered Village at Purwakarta, and Plered Village at Bantul Yogyakarta. Behind the similarity there are essentiality instttusionalized to rural community at three Plered Village such as as have high enterpreneur value, similar value, similar language that is Java and Sunda language, thrith and dinamic , second the government of Plered some of the villages have high capacity of faith, the priority of discussion and agreement aspects. And become asymetry traditional reshuffle to financial reshuffle."

"Hingga saat ini Indonesia masih menghadapi masalah korupsi atas keuangan negara yang masih tinggi meskipun upaya perbaikan sistem laporan keuangan yang berkualitas sudah diterapkan. Di sisi lain, dengan sistem desentralisasi dan pemilihan langsung atas lembaga legislatif dan eksekutif pemerintahan, divided government akan mendorong terjadinya proses checks and balances yang juga dapat mengurangi korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat peran sistem pelaporan keuangan sebagai bentuk dari good governance dan peran divided government terhadap korupsi. Dengan tidak menggunakan variabel korupsi yang berupa persepsi karena bersifat subjektif dan cenderung bias, studi ini menggunakan data korupsi yang bersifat inkracht sehingga dapat menggambarkan kasus korupsi yang sebenarnya terjadi.Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa good governance dengan indikator opini BPK yang diperoleh pemerintah kabupaten/kota belum bersifat substantif menggambarkan penggunaan keuangan negara. Akibatnya korupsi masih tetap terjadi pada wilayah yang sudah memperoleh opini terbaik. Sedangkan divided government yang seharusnya mendorong adanya checks and balances justru memunculkan ruang untuk negosiasi dan membuat peluang terjadinya korupsi semakin besar. Terlepas dari hal itu, upaya pemberantasan korupsi pada era pertama presiden Jokowi lebih baik dibandingkan periode sebelumnya.

---

Indonesia still faces the problem of corruption in the country's finances which are still high even though efforts to improve the quality of the financial report system have been implemented. Furthermore, with a decentralized and direct election system of the legislative and executive institutions, divided government will encourage the process of checks and balances which can reduce corruption. This study aims to investigate the role of financial reporting systems as a representation of good governance and the role of divided government against corruption. Instead of using corruption perception variables which are subjective and susceptible to be biased, this study uses inkracht corruption data that can describe corruption cases that actually occur.

The results of the study show that good governance approached by Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan - BPK) opinion indicators obtained by district/city governments have not been substantively describing the use of state finances. As a result, corruption still occurs in the regions even for those which have obtained the best opinion. Whereas divided government, which should encourage checks and balances, promotes situations for negotiations and makes the chances of corruption occurring even greater. Despite on that fact, efforts to eradicate corruption in President Jokowi's first era were better than the previous government."

"The amendments through Indonesian Constitution of i945 (UUD I945) have impacted to various change including to government system. The change an the government system has came about UUD 1945 (at pre-amendments) is the semi-presidential then it's become hilly presidential system after amended. The -author here also scrutinizes on the government system which had appeared in not only the constitutional level but also on the practice in the national implementations. The author also presents her advices for the legislator members to deeper grasped toward basic concepts which had been exercised by UUD l 945 post-amendments, including the presidential system. its directed to the presidential power to make legislations will not disregard to UUD 1945."

"Abstract. There is an increasing trend among investors to consider Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in determining company incentives are to be invested in. Obviously, investors would prefer to make INVESTMENTS in companies that adopt Good Corporate Governance rather than otherwise. This view has eventually led to a belief that GCG can give added values not only to the adopting company, but also to the stakeholders. This research analyzes the impacts of family ownership and founding CEO/chairperson on a company?s costs of debt. This topic is chosen in consideration that there are still a lot of family-owned companies in Indonesia. The research uses a positivist-quantitative paradigm and the samples are 64 family-owned companies listed at the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2007 to 2009. The research also uses a random effect model. The results of the research indicate that family ownership has positive but insignificant impacts, while founding CEO/chairperson has no impacts on a company?s costs of debt."