Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Peralatan produksi pada industri minyak dan gas saat ini sudah banyak yang beroperasi mendekati umur desainnya. Khususnya peralatan produksi berupa pipa penyalur bawah air, bahkan banyak yang sudah beroperasi melewati umur desain. Meskipun demikian pipa penyalur tersebut masih digunakan untuk mengalirkan cairan hidrokarbon dengan laju alir dan tekanan yang relatif tinggi. Hal ini guna mengimbangi semakin tingginya kegiatan sumuran yang dilakukan, baik pengeboran sumur baru, peningkatan produksi sumur yang ada dengan artificial lift (water injection atau gas lift) maupun pengaktifan kembali sumur mati atau idle. Untuk memastikan bahwa integritas pipa penyalur masih baik untuk mendukung kontinyuitas produksi minyak dan gas, maka kegiatan integritas yang mencakup inspeksi, perawatan dan perbaikan dilakukan secara berkala untuk menghindari kehilangan produksi tidak terjadwal. Inspeksi pipa penyalur bawah air yang dipakai menggunakan metoda Inline Inspection (ILI) karena pertimbangan efisiensi waktu dan biaya. Kajian integritas menghasilkan nilai failure pressure (PF) 176,6 bar dan safe operating pressure (PS) 127,2 bar. Nilai tersebut masih di atas MAOP pipa 29 bar sehingga pipa masih layak operasi saat ini. Mempertimbangkan laju korosi sebesar 0,797 mmpy maka kajian sisa umur layan pipa penyalur adalah 2,4 tahun dari inspeksi terakhir. Korelasi yang signifikan antara laju korosi maupun penipisan ketebalan dinding pipa terhadap waktu usia pipa ditunjukkan dengan nilai R=1. Model matematika untuk fungsi ketebalan dinding pipa (Ta) = -0.1588x2+3.6195x-16.669 dan fungsi laju korosi (CR) = 0.0137x2-0.3752x + 3.2674.

---

Production equipment in oil and gas industry mostly have already been operated close to its design life. Especially for subsea pipeline, many of those have already operated exceed its design life. Nevertheless, the subsea pipelines are still utilized to flow the hydrocarbon fluid with high flowrate and pressure. This is to accommodate and compensate the increasing of well activity, such as drilling new well, improvement of well performance through artificial lift (water or gas lift injection) or reactivation the idle well. As assurance that integrity of subsea pipelines is still fit for service to support continuity oil and gas production lifting, then inspection activity shall be done in frequent. Subsea pipeline inspection activity which commonly used due to its time and cost efficiency is inline inspection (ILI). Integrity assessment resulting the pipeline failure pressure (PF) 176,6 bar and safe operating pressure (PS) 127,2 bar. These values are much higher than pipeline MAOP 29 bar so that pipeline is fit for service. Considering corrosion rate value 0,797 mmpy, then remaining life assessment resulting the pipeline has remaining life for 2,4 year from last inspection. Significant correlation between corrosion rate and pipeline wall thickness by time is showed by value R=1. Mathematic model for pipeline wall thickness (Ta) = -0.1588x2 + 3.6195x-16.669 while corrosion rate (CR) = 0.0137x2-0.3752x + 3.2674."

"Manajemen integritas pipa penyalur dimulai dari bagaimana ancaman terhadap integritas pipa penyalur di-identifikasi dan dikelola dengan efektif. Penilaian resiko terhadap ancaman integritas pipa penyalur dilakukan terhadap aset pipa penyalur sebagai obyek yang di-analisa. Pendekatan pendataan informasi keselamatan proses (process safety information) aset pipa penyalur umumnya diperlakukan melekat sebagai satu kesatuan jalur utuh dari Launcher ke Receiver. Keberagaman mode ancaman dan mode kerusakan menjadi dasar melakukan segmentasi pipa penyalur tersebut agar penilaian resiko lebih akurat. Dengan kemajuan teknologi inspeksi saat ini, inspeksi In-Line-Inspection menjadi semakin akurat dan terjangkau. Inspeksi baseline atau re-inspeksi In-Line-Inspection berpotensi menjadi basis pendataan aset (Asset Register) karena mampu mendeteksi komponen-komponen perpipaan pada pipeline secara akurat. Dengan adanya pendataan informasi keselamatan proses secara detail pada setiap komponen perpipaan, segmentasi yang dilakukan saat penilaian resiko dapat menjadi lebih detail sampai ke level komponen. Tesis ini membahas bagaimana memanfaatkan potensi penilaian resiko yang lebih detail hingga ke level komponen dengan memanfaatkan asset register yang detail yang diperoleh dari pemanfaatan data in-line inspection. Kelemahan dari metode segmentasi detail adalah banyaknya data dan juga usaha yang diperlukan dalam melakukan penilaian resiko. Namun dari berkembangnya teknologi informasi saat ini, populasi data yang besar (big data) dapat dikelola dengan bantuan teknologi informasi yang relevan.

---

Pipeline integrity management is initiated from how hazards/threats toward pipeline integrity are to be identified and managed effectively. Risk assessment conducted to pipeline integrity hazards/threats is subjected to how the pipeline as object is perceived to be analyzed. The approach of documenting process safety information on pipeline generally developed and regarded as a whole pipeline assets consist from launcher to receiver. The diverse of threats and damage mechanism along the line is the basis of pipeline segmentation in order to specify risk assessment object thus increase its accuracy. In the development of inspection technology, in-line-inspections are become more sensitive and become more affordable. Whether baseline or re-inspection of in-lineinspection could have potential to be utilized in developing asset register, because it can distinguish pipeline components accurately. By embedding process safety information specific for each pipeline components, the segmentation taken during pipeline risk assessment can be detailed to the component level. The focus of this study is analyzing pros and cons of utilization the advantages of detailed pipeline risk assessment to component level by utilizing detailed asset register which obtained from in-lineinspection data. The weakness of detailed segmentation is the abundant of segment to be analyzed and increase the efforts during risk assessment. However, in the development of information technology, big data can be manageable by utilizing relevant information technology."

"Pipa sebagai sistem penyaluran atau distribusi menjadi kebutuhan utama di industri minyak dan gas bumi saat ini. Namun penggunaan jalur pipa ini tersimpan bahaya sehingga menjadi salah satu sumber bahaya utama instalasi minyak dan gas bumi di dunia. Penilaian risiko fasiltas operasi di industri minyak dan gas bumi mutlak diperlukan untuk melihat tingkat kegagalan dan kehandalan sistem operasi fasilitas tersebut. Fasilitas CGP SKW PTJM akan dilakukan perubahan fasilitas, salah satunya adalah pipa penyalur LPG existing 8 inchi sepanjang 110 km yang akan menjadi pipa penyalur pipa kondensat dari CGP SKW ke ORF J. Keadaan tersebut menyebabkan diperlukannya penilaian risiko kembali fasilitas pipa existing 8 inchi sepanjang 110 km. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mendapatkan gambaran risiko relatif keberadaan jalur pipa kondensat ukuran 8 inchi dari CGP SKW ke ORF J sepanjang 110 km. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode semi kuantitatif model W. Kent Muhlbauer tahun 2004. Pembagian seksi pipa dilakukan berdasarkan kepemilikan lahan, tipe penggunaan lahan, kedalaman pipa, buoyancy control, teknik konstruksi, tipe proteksi katodik dan tipe vegetasi sehingga menghasilkan 12 seksi jaringan pipa. Dari hasil penelitian diperoleh indek risiko yang paling rendah adalah indek indek kesalahan pihak ketiga dengan nilai (69,50), setelah itu indek desain dengan nilai (70,50), urutan berikutnya adalah indeks korosi dengan nilai sebesar (71,33), dan indeks yang tertinggi adalah indek kesalahan operasi dengan nilai sebesar 85. Faktor dampak kebocoran tertinggi terdapat pada seksi 1, 9, 11 dan 12 dengan nilai 5,25. Faktor dampak kebocoran terendah terdapat pada seksi 2,4,6,7 dan 10 dengan nilai 1,75. Seksi pipa yang paling berisiko untuk mengalami kegagalan paling tinggi adalah seksi 1, 11 dan 12 dengan nilai 56,95. Sedangkan seksi pipa yang paling tidak berisiko untuk mengalami kegagalan adalah seksi 6 dengan nilai 174,29. PTJM berdasarkan standar AS/ANZ 4360 harus melakukan pengelolaan risiko dengan prioritas puncak pada seksi pipa 1,3,5,8,9, 11 dan 12. Variabel risiko yang dapat dilakukan peningkatan oleh PTJM antara lain indek kerusakan pihak ketiga (line locating, public education, ROW condition dan patrol frequency), indeks korosi (proteksi internal, tes timbal, close interval survey condition dan internal inspection), indeks desain (corrective action) dan indeks kesalahan operasi (safety system, SCADA, training dan mechanical error preventer).

---

Pipeline as transmission and distribution system becoming major demands for oil and gas industry today. However these pipeline applying contain hazard that become the one of the major instalation hazard source in world of oil and gas installation. Operating facilitiy risk assessment is essential for oil and gas industry operation to overview facility operation system failure and reliability level. In the other hand, CGP SKW PTJM will change their facility structure, one of the changes is 8 inch LPG existing pipeline along 110 km that will becoming condensate pipeline from CGP SKW to ORF J. These condition to cause the need to reassess of 8 inch existing pipeline risk along 110 km.

This study was conducted to have risk relative overview of 8 inch condensate pipeliene from CGP SKW to ORF J along 110 km. The study use 2004 W. Kent Muhlbauer semi quantitative method. Pipe sectioning of this study was conducted based on land ownership, land use, pipe depth, buoyancy control, construction type, cathodic protection type and vegetation tipe that resulted 12 section of pipeline.

From these study generate risk relative score, the lowest risk relative score is coming from third party index with score of 69.53, then the second one is design index with score of 70.50, the third one is corrosion index with score of 71.33, and the highest one is incorrect operatios index with score of 85. The highest score for leak impact factors is coming from section 1, 9, 11 and 12 with score of 5.25. The lowest leak impact factors is coming from section 2,4,6,7 and 10 with score of 1.75.

Pipe section that have the highest risk for chance of failure is section 1,11 and 12 with score of 56,95. While the lowest one is section 6 with score of 169,71. According to AS/ANZ 4360 standard, PTJM have to conduct pipeline risk management with top priority on section 1,3,5,8,9, 11 and 12. Risk variables that can be improved by PTJM are third party index (line locating, public education, ROW condition and patrol frequency), corrosion index (internal protection, lead test, close interval survey condition and internal inspection), design index (corrective action) and incorrect operations index (safety system, SCADA, training and mechanical error preventer)."

"Subsea Pipeline Engineering was the first of its kind, written by two of the world's most respected authorities in subsea pipeline engineering. In the second edition, these industry veterans have updated their definitive reference book, covering the entire spectrum of subjects in the discipline, from route selection and planning to design, construction, installation, materials and corrosion, inspection, welding, repair, risk assessment, and applicable design codes and standards. Particular attention is also devoted to the important specialized subjects of hydraulics, strength, stability, fracture, upheaval, lateral buckling and decommissioning. The book is distilled from the authors' vast experience in the industry and their popular course on Marine Pipeline Engineering"

"Presented in easy-to-use, step-by-step order, Pipeline rules of thumb handbook is a quick reference for day-to-day pipeline operations. For more than 35 years, the Pipeline rules of thumb handbook has served as the "go-to" reference for solving even the most day-to-day vexing pipeline workflow problems. Now in its 8th edition, this handbook continues to set the standard by which all other piping books are judged. Along with over 30% new or updated material regarding codes, construction processes, and equipment, this book continues to offer hundreds of "how-to" methods and handy formulas for pipeline construction, design, and engineering and features a multitude of calculations to assist in problem solving, directly applying the rules and equations for specific design and operating conditions to illustrate correct application, all in one convenient reference.For the first time in this new edition, we are taking the content and data off the page and adding a new dimension of practical value for you with online interactive features to accompany some of the handiest and most useful material from the book :- Interactive tables that takes data from the book and turns them into a sortable spreadsheet format that gives you the ability to perform your own basic filtering functions, show/hide columns of just the data that is important to you, and download the table into an Excel spreadsheet for additional use- A graph digitizer which pulls a graph from the book and gives you the power to plot your own lines on the existing graph, see all the relative x/y coordinates of the graph, and name and color code your lines for clarity- A converter calculator performing basic conversions from the book such as metric conversions, time, temperature, length, power and more."

"Penelitian ini memfokuskan pada penilaian resiko pada pipa gas alam dengan teknik Risk Based Assessment. Beberapa survey dilakukan pada pipa untuk mengetahui keadaan aktual pipa diantaranya pengujian resistivitas tanah, pengukuran pH, pengujian sistem proteksi katodik, pengukuran ketebalan pipa dan coating dan pengumpulan data pipa. Pipa diidentifikasi untuk mengetahui potensial bahaya. Data digunakan untuk analisis probability dan consequence dari resiko. Dari hasil penelitian didapatkan rating dari probability dan consequence. Kedua nilai tersebut diplot pada matriks resiko. Pipa gas dikategorikan medium risk. Nilai resiko tersebut dikarenakan tingginya nilai consequence yang disebabkan oleh korosi internal dari pipa. Tingkatan resiko tersebut berlaku untuk area yang masuk ke dalam radius potential impact area. Nilai potensial impact area yaitu 35,6 meter dari pipa. Beberapa insepksi harus dilakukan untuk mengurangi nilai dari resiko tersebut.

---

The research focused on assessing risk of gas pipeline using Risk Based Assessment technique. Several surveys were done to pipeline to understand actual condition of pipeline like soil resistivity, cathodic protection system, wall and coating thickness survey. Pipe is identified to understand potential hazard. Data are used to analysis risk probability and consequence.

The research obtained showed probability and consequence factor. Both of factor are plotted to risk matrix. Gas pipeline categorized to medium risk. Rating of risk is caused by consequence factor from internal corrosion of pipeline. Risk level is obtained for radius of potential impact area. Value of potenstial impact area is 35,6 meter from pipeline. Some inspection must be done to reduce level of risk."

"Perusahaan energi dan Perusahaan kimia menggunakan pipa penyalur untuk menyalurkan minyak, gas dan fluida lainnya dari satu tempat ke tempat lainnya, baik didalam lokasi pabrik maupun antar pabrik. Integritas pipa penyalur menjadi sangat penting dikarenakan kebocoran pipa penyalur dapat menyebabkan kerugian ekonomi maupun lingkungan yang sangat serius. Beberapa penelitian telah diterapkan pada pipa penyalur mengetahui dan mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi nilai ekstrapolasi ketebalan minimum pipa penyalur menggunakan Teori Nilai Ekstrim. Penelitian ini menggunakan dan menerapkan model statistik dan Metode Extreme Value untuk kehandalan pipa penyalur dengan mengasumsikan laju korosi yang tetap dan deviasi akibat alat ukur diabaikan. Penelitian ini mendapatkan sisa usia pakai dari 344 blok data dari pipa penyalur sekitar 5,23 tahun dengan menggunakan teknik Generalized Extreme Value. Sehingga disarankan untuk melakukan pigging pada pipa penyalur dalam 2,5 tahun yang akan datang. Data yang sama disimulasikan dengan teknik Generalized Pareto Distribution namun hasil menyatakan bahwa distribusinya tidak sesuai dengan distribusi Pareto sehingga nilai ekstrim minimum, sisa usia pakai pipa penyalur dan waktu pigging berikutnya tidak dapat ditentukan

---

Energy and chemical companies use pipelines to transfer oil, gas and other materials from one place to another, within and between their plants. Pipeline integrity is an important concern because pipeline leakage could result in serious economic or environmental losses. Some researches has applied to understand the effect on extrapolation value of minimum thickness of pipeline by using the Extreme Value Theory. In this research both statistical models and Extreme Value methods were applied and developed for reliability of pipeline by assuming the constant corrosion rate and deviation due to measuring devices was neglected. The research obtained that the remaining life of 344 blocks data of the pipeline around 5,23 years by using Generalized Extreme Value Technique. It could be suggested that next pipeline pigging should be conducted within 2,5 years. The result found that the extreme value method seems not close agreement with the Pareto Distribution so the minimum extreme value, remaining useful and next pigging could not be determined. "

"Sistem pipa bawah laut merupakan sarana transportasi yang sangat penting terutama untuk menyalurkan minyak dan gas bumi dari sumbernya ke tempat pengolahan. Akibat dari kondisi topografi dasar laut yang tidak teratur, suatu offshore pipeline bisa saja terbentang bebas atau mengalami free span. Salah satu aspek penting dalam perancangan offshore pipeline adalah analisa rentangan bebas (free span analysis). Pada pengerjaan skripsi kali ini perhitungan free span dinamik pada pipa bawah laut yang dilakukan dengan menggunakan perhitungan berdasarkan Boyun Guo dan panjang span statik berdasarkan ASME B31.8 untuk pipa gas 14 inchi pada Oyong Project milik Santos Pty Ltd dan juga menggunakan program CFD yaitu program EFD Lab. Program tersebut akan digunakan untuk mensimulasikan kondisi aliran disekitar pipa bawah laut tersebut dan fenomena vortex shedding yang terjadi dan nantinya hasil dari program tersebut akan digunakan untuk dijadikan perbandingan perhitungan dari literatur yang telah dilakukan.

---

Subsea pipeline system is a means of transportation which is very important especially for delivering oil and gas from the source to the processing. As a result of the condition of the seabed topography is not smooth, an offshore pipeline could go free or have free span. One important aspect in the design of offshore pipeline analysis is free span analysis.

At the time this final project is processing calculations on the dynamic free span pipeline under the sea by using a calculation based on offshore pipeline Boyun Guo and static based on the length of span ASME B31.8 for 14 inches gas pipeline on the property of Santos Oyong Project Pty Ltd and also using the CFD program (EFD Lab). The program will be used to simulate flow conditions around the pipe under the sea and the vortex shedding phenomenon which occurs later and the results of the program will be used for the calculation of comparative literature that has been done."