Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini membahas peran yang dilakukan oleh SELDA dan Karapatan dalam proses agenda setting pada Kebijakan Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition di Filipina tahun 2012-2013. Dalam mengkaji peran yang dilakukan oleh SELDA dan Karapatan tentang proses agenda setting Kebijakan Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition, penulis menggunakan teori agenda setting dan konsep NGO untuk menganalisis. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif. Fokus penelitian ini terletak pada peran SELDA dan Karapatan sebagai NGO yang bergerak di bidang HAM dalam proses agenda setting Kebijakan Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition. Peran yang dilakukan oleh SELDA dan Karapatan adalah 1 advokasi terhadap isu Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition; 2 artikulasi kepentingan Pemerintah Filipina.

---

This study examines the roles performed by SELDA and Karapatan in the agenda setting process on Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition Act in the Philippines 2012 2013. In examining the roles performed by SELDA and Karapatan in the agenda setting process of Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition Act, the authors use the agenda setting theory and the concept of NGO to analyze. This study is a descriptive research using qualitative method. The focus of this study lies in the role of SELDA and Karapatan as NGOs working in the field of human rights in the process of agenda setting the Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition Act. The roles performed by SELDA and Karapatan are 1 advocacy on the issue of Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition 2 articulation of interests of the Philippine Government."

"Contents: I. The philippines island ; II. Early history ; III. American occupation ; IV. Civil goverment ; V. Public order ; VI. Finances ; VII. Justice ; VIII. Health ; IX. Public works ; X. Education ; XI. Prisons ; XII. Various governmental activities ; XIII. Baguio ; XIV. Tribal peoples"

"The metaphor of 'dialogue' has been put to different descriptive and evaluative uses by constitutional and political theorists studying interactions between institutions concerning rights. It has also featured prominently in the opinions of courts and the rhetoric and deliberations of legislators. This volume brings together many of the world's leading constitutional and political theorists to debate the nature and merits of constitutional dialogues between the judicial, legislative, and executive branches. Constitutional Dialogue explores dialogue's democratic significance, examines its relevance to the functioning and design of constitutional institutions, and covers constitutional dialogues from an international and transnational perspective."