Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Pendidikan merupakan salah satu aspek esensial dalam kehidupan seorang individu. Setiap individu ingin mengejar pendidikan tinggi untuk mendapatkan legitimasi sosial dengan anggapan bahwa menempuh pendidikan tinggi akan lebih dihormati. Salah satu film yang membahas isu tersebut adalah Parasite, film yang disutradarai oleh Bong Joon-ho dengan tema kelas sosial yang terjadi di Korea. Oleh karena itu penulis ingin meneliti bagaimana ambisi masyarakat Korea terhadap pendidikan tinggi digambarkan dalam film Parasite. Selain itu, bentuk ambisi terhadap pendidikan tinggi dalam film Parasite, penyebab dan dampaknya bagi masyarakat akan dibahas dalam penelitian ini. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan sosiologi sastra. Melalui penelitian ini dapat diketahui bahwa, ambisi terhadap pendidikan tinggi terjadi karena keinginan untuk mendapatkan mobilitas sosial.

---

Education is one of the essential aspects of an individual's life. Every individual wants to pursue higher education to gain social legitimacy with the assumption that pursuing higher education will be more respected. One of the films that discusses this issue is Parasite, a film directed by Bong Joon-ho with the theme of social class that takes place in Korea. Therefore, the author wants to examine how Korean people ambitions towards higher education are depicted in the film Parasite. In addition, the form of ambition towards higher education in the film Parasite, its causes and impact on society also will be discussed in this study. The method used in this study is descriptive qualitative with a literary sociology approach. Through this research it can be seen that, ambition towards higher education occurs due to the desire to obtain social mobility."

"This volume provides a critical roadmap through the major historical sources of legal semiotics as we know them today. The history of legal semiotics, now at least a century old, has never been written (a non-event itself pregnant with semiotic possibility).  As a consequence, its sources are seldom clearly exposed and, as word, object and meaning change, are sometimes lost. They reach from an English translation of the 1916 inaugural lecture of the first Chair in Legal Significs at the Amsterdam University, via mid 20th century studies on “property” or “contract,” to equally fascinating essays on contemporary semiotic problems produced by former students of the Roberta Kevelson Semiotics Roundtable Seminar at Penn State University 2012 and 2013. Together, the materials in this book weave the fabric of semiotics and significs, two names for the unfolding of semiotics in law and legal discourse at least until the second half of the 20th century, and both of which covered a lawyer’s focus on sign and meaning in law.  The latter is embedded within the cultural imperatives of the civilization that gave these terms meaning and made them an effective tool for the dissection of law, its reconstitution as an instrument to be used by the lawyer to advance the interests of her clients, and for judges as a means to restructure language as a narrative of law whose power could bend behavior to its strictures. Legal semiotics has become an indispensible part of the elite lawyer’s toolkit and a fundamental approach to analysis of legal texts. Two previous volumes published in 2011 and 2012 explored the conceptual, methodological and epistemological progress in the field of legal semiotics, the modern forms of semiotics study, and the mechanics of meaning making processes by lawyers. Yet the great lessons of semiotics requires a focus on the origins of the concepts and frameworks that would become contemporary legal semiotics, its origins as an object of the consciousness of meaning making—one whose roots, as lessons for the oracular conversations of law, are expanded in this volume."

"Summary:Provides a practical, step-by-step guide to doing a research project from start to finish. This title includes: information on using online surveys; information on online interviewing and using online platforms for observation; new chapter on the use of social media in small scale research; and updated chapter on literature searching"

"ABSTRACTThe global civil society is often regarded as a progressive moral force that provides advocacy andprotection of marginalized groups in the global political arena. Nevertheless, departing from the belief that civil society has great power and influence over global dynamics, it sees that the legitimacy claims they articulate and articulated by academics are essential to be evaluated, especially with regard to their representation and accountability groups and individual beneficiaries. This paper concludes that the claims of legitimacy of civil society are less justifiable, both normatively and empirically. From the normative point of view, claims for civil society representation are problematic because they are often less ethical and thus have a counterproductive effect on the benefit of beneficiaries. In addition, they are more accountable to donors and the sustainability of related institutions than the interests of beneficiaries. From the empirical point of view, the legitimacy of civil society is also questionable because it is now emerging discourses from their own beneficiaries who oppose the actions of representatives and the lack of accountability demonstrated by International Non-Governmental Organizations over Beneficiaries. This paper concludes with a recommendation to the International NGOs to put the Beneficiaries interests as top priority and stop projecting beneficiaries as passive, mute, and without political agency."