Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"There is no area of social psychology that does not involve emotions. Not only has social psychology contributed enormously to theory and research on the nature of emotions, it also has emotions at the heart of its basic subject matter, from attitudes and dissonance to altruism and aggression. This reader presents a collection of articles on the nature of emotions and their role in social psychological phenomena, along with recent work that reflects the current state of the art. Articles have been selected and edited for readability, succinctness, and interest. For the beginning student, this reader serves as an introduction to the social psychology of emotions, and makes a useful text for advanced undergraduate and graduate courses on emotions, social processes, and related topics. It may also serve as a supplement to a general text on social psychology."

"Dengan adanya kemajuan teknologi dan kemudahan berbelanja secara daring (online shop), kita sering menghadapi berbagai pilihan atau yang biasa disebut dengan intertemporal choice. Pilihan yang bernilai lebih kecil dan diperoleh lebih cepat disebut dengan smaller-sooner (SS) sedangkan pilihan yang bernilai lebih besar dan diperoleh lebih lama disebut dengan larger-later (LL). Salah satu faktor yang dapat memengaruhi intertemporal choice adalah emosi. Penelitian eksperimen ini bertujuan untuk membuktikan apakah mahasiswa dengan tingkat arousal emosi negatif yang tinggi akan memilih SS dalam intertemporal choice secara signifikan lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan mahasiswa dengan tingkat arousal emosi negatif yang rendah. Sebanyak 82 mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Desain penelitian ini adalah randomized between-subject two groups design dengan membandingkan kelompok emosi marah (n = 35) dan sedih (n = 47). Tingkat arousal emosi dimanipulasi melalui autobiographical recall. Hasil analisis chi-square for independence menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa kelompok marah tidak memilih SS secara signifikan lebih tinggi dibandingkan kelompok sedih (χ2(1) = 2,377, p = 0,119, d = -0,170).

---

With the advances of technology and the convenience of online shopping, we often face a variety of choices or what is commonly referred to as intertemporal choices. Choices that are valued smaller and can be directly obtained are called smaller-sooner (SS), while those that are valued larger and can be obtained later are called larger-later (LL). One factor that can influence intertemporal choice is emotion.

This experimental study aimed to prove whether college students with high levels of negative emotion’s arousal would significantly choose SS in intertemporal choices higher than students with low levels of negative emotion’s arousal. A total of 82 University of Indonesia students participated in this study.

The design of this study was randomized between subject two groups design which compared angry (n = 35) and sad group (n = 47). Arousal emotions are manipulated through autobiographical recall. Chi-square for independence analysis showed that the college students in angry group did not choose the SS significantly higher than the sad group (χ2 (1) = 2.337, p = 0.119, d = -0.170)."

"Penelitian ini adalah penelitian lanjutan dari studi Maglio, Trope, dan Liberman (2013b) mengenai pengaruh jarak spasial dalam mengurangi sensitivitas terhadap jarak sosial (studi 5). Penelitian lanjutan ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap bagaimana faktor emosi yang diatribusikan pada jarak sosial yang jauh dapat memengaruhi efek jarak spasial terhadap jarak sosial, mengingat penilaian jarak sosial pasti melibatkan emosi yang dirasakan individu terhadap objek penilaian. Penelitian ini terdiri dari dua studi yang melibatkan 186 mahasiswa S1 psikologi UI sebagai partisipan. Studi pertama yang merupakan replikasi dari studi 5 Maglio, dkk (2013b) menunjukkan hasil serupa dengan penelitian acuan, yaitu kelompok dengan manipulasi jarak spasial jauh merasakan jarak sosial yang lebih dekat dibandingkan kelompok partisipan dengan manipulasi jarak spasial dekat, F(1, 59,6)= 5,12, p=0,04, η2= 0,06. Studi kedua mengungkap bahwa terdapat interaksi antara jarak spasial dengan emosi, ΔR2= 0,023, F(2,186)= 3,40, p= 0,03. Secara lebih detail, pemberian manipulasi emosi negatif pada jarak sosial jauh dapat menguatkan pengaruh jarak spasial terhadap jarak sosial, b=-13122,58, t= -2,46, p= 0,01 jika dibandingkan dengan kelompok tanpa manipulasi emosi, b= -11357,81,t= -2,17, p= 0,03. Sebaliknya, pemberian manipulasi emosi positif pada jarak sosial jauh membuat manipulasi jarak spasial tidak signifikan dalam mengurangi sensitivitas terhadap jarak sosial, b= 4866,67, t= 0,89, p= 0,37. Oleh karena itu, emosi dapat menjadi moderator antara pengaruh jarak spasil terhadap jarak sosial.

---

This research is the continuation of Maglio, Trope and Liberman (2013b) study about the influence of spatial distance in reducing sensitivity of social distance (study 5). This continuation study was conducted to discover how emotional factors that are attributed toward social distance can influence the effect of spatial distance toward social distance, considering how social distance perception must involves emotion felt by individual concerning perceived object. This research involves two studies with 186 undergraduate psychology UI students as the participants. The first study is a replication from Maglio, et al.(2013b) study 5, which resulted on similar result with the original study, whereas the group with far spatial distance manipulation perceive closer social distance compared to the group with near spatial distance manipulation, F(1,59,6)= 5,12, p= 0,04, η2= 0,06. The second study reveal that there is an interaction between spatial distance and emotion, ΔR2= 0,023, F(2,186)= 3,40, p=0,03. On more specific note, negative emotion manipulation on far social distance can enhance the influence of spatial distance toward social distance, b=-13122,58, t= -2,46, p= 0,01 compared to the group with no emotional manipulation, b= -11357,81, t= -2,17, p= 0,03. In contrast, positive emotion manipulation on social distance makes spatial distance manipulation insignificant in reducing sensitivity toward social distance, b= 4866,67, t= 0,89, p= 0,37. In summary, emotion can be a moderator between the influence of spatial distance toward social distance."