Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"

Perkembangan lembaga negara mengalami dinamika sesuai dengan kebutuhan dalam menjalankan kekuasaan negara. Salah satu kebutuhan yang diangap penting oleh pengambil keputusan adalah pentingnya pembinaan ideologi Pancasila terhadap seluruh penyelenggara negara yang berujung pembentukan Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila (BPIP). Lahirnya lembaga ini menjadi perdebatan mulai dari hal yang paling mendasar: ada tidaknya urgensi pembinaan ideologi di Indonesia. Pro kontra juga lahir terkait kedudukan, tugas, dan fungsinya yang tercantum dalam Peraturan Presiden Nomor 7 Tahun 2018 tentang Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila. Perbedaan pandangan mengenai hubungannya dengan lembaga negara lain pun menjadi perbincangan hangat dalam kajian Hukum Tata Negara. Dengan penelitian yuridis normatif, penelitian ini bertujuan menjelaskan kedudukan dan kewenangan Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila dalam sistem ketatanegaraan di Indonesia. Penulis juga mengkaji potensi tumpang tindih dengan lembaga negara lain berkaitan tugas dan fungsinya. Sebagai pengayaan penulis membawa contoh pandangan konstitusi beberapa negara terkait ideologi.

---

The development of state institutions experiences dynamics in accordance with the need to exercise state power. One of the needs that is considered important by decision makers is the importance of fostering the ideology of Pancasila to all state administrators which ended in the creation of new state institutions called Pancasila Ideology Guidance Agency (BPIP). The existence of this institution became something debatable s from the most basic: the urgency of fostering ideology in Indonesia. Pros and cons were also born related to the position, duties, and functions as written in Presidential Regulation Number 7 Year 2018 about the Pancasila Ideology Guidance Agency. Differences views regarding its relationship with other state institutions also became an issue in the study of Constitutional Law. With normative juridical research, this study aims to explain the position and authority of the Pancasila Ideology Guidance Agency in the constitutional system in Indonesia. The author also examines the potential for overlapping with other state institutions regarding their duties and functions. As an enrichment the author brings an example of the views of the constitutions of several countries related to ideology.

"

"Buku ini merupakan kumpulan tulisan (artikel) dari berbagai penulis mengenai kesusastraan Rusia. "

"This volume arises out of a symposium held at the third Theoretical archaeology Group conference, Reading, U.K. in December 1981. Most of the papers are, however, either extensively revised or use quite different examples from the original presentations. All but one of the contributors to this volume also wrote papers for an earlier publication in this series, Symbolic and Structural Archaeology (Hodder, Ed. 1982). The ideas that form the focus of this volume were one of a number to be tentatively explored there.A consideration of ideology and power means that we are no longer able simply to 'read off the nature of past societies from material evidence. Instead the archaeological record must be understood as actively mediated and manipulated as part of the social strategies of the individuals and groups that constituted a past society. Material culture can be used to express interests and ideas which may very well be contradictory. In order to understand ideology and power successfully a historical, particularist and contextual approach to the evidence is fundamental."