Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Kapitalisme sebagai sistem yang muncul di tengah-tengah masyarakat industri menjadi fenomena tersendiri di dalam relasi kehidupan manusia. Karl Marx sebagai seorang pemikir ekonomi, menemukan kontradiksi di dalam relasi kapitalisme ini, yaitu relasi kelas borjuis dan proletar. Ia menyatakan bahwa relasi hanya sekedar membawa kemunduran terutama bagi nilai-nilai kehidupan manusia, untuk itu diperlukan suatu gagasan final untuk mengakhiri relasi kelas ini dengan cara melakukan perjuangan kelas. Namun nyatanya gagasan finalitas Marx yang dianggap sebagai klimaks dari tatanan masyarakat belum bersifat menyeluruh menyentuh kefinalitasan tersebut, banyak celah yang masih dapat dikaji lebih mendalam. Slavoj Zizek sebagai pemikir Post-Marxian mencoba untuk mengkritik gagasan finalitas yang diusung oleh Marx. Menurutnya gagasan finalitas melampaui proses pembentukan subjek yang bersifat kontingen dan selalu berusaha untuk merevisi tatanan- tatanan simbolik yang ada.

---

Capitalism as a system that appears in the middle of an industrial society become a phenomenon in the relation of human life. Karl Marx as an economic thinker, finding contradictions in its relation, the relation of the bourgeois and the proletariat. He stated that the relationship just decreasing human value, so that it needed a final idea to solve this class relationwith take a class struggle. But in fact the idea of finality considered the climax of the whole society is not yet touched the finality itself, many gaps still needed to be studied more in depth. Slavoj Zizek as Post-Marxian thinker tried to criticize the idea of finality brought by Marx. According to him, the idea of finality beyond forming process that is contingent and subject always trying to revise the arrangements existing symbolic."

"In philosophical discussions, politics is one of the most interesting, deep but also slippery topics. It is interesting because it aims to make life in society more humane,deep because it involves a variety of interests, and slippery because it is a discussion between citizens on various issues in a public space. This interesting, deep and slippery discourse is analyzed by Hannah Arendt by clearly distinguishing between what is political and what is apolitical. In what is political, there are freedom and plurality. This becomes evident in the arena called "public space'’. On the other hand,what is apolitical can be defined as forcing the citizens into uniformity. According the Arendt, authentic politics has to be vivified by freedom, supported by plurality among human beings and strengthened by interlocution [communication] among citizens in public space."