Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 6147 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Canberra: Centre for International and Public Law, 1992
342.940 6 ADM
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1971
350 SPA (1)
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Sathe, SP
Gurgaon: Lexis Nexis, 2009
342.06 SAT a
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Schwartz, Bernard
Boston : Little, Brown & Co., 1980
342.06 SCH a
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Andersen, William R.
Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2010
342.06 AND m
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Rizqan Naelufar
"[ABSTRAK
Tesis ini merupakan kajian yang hendak melihat konsep lembaga yang
berwenang dalam sebuah proses peradilan. Relevansi antar lembaga sebagaimana
dimaksud yaitu Komisi Informasi dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara adalah
berwenang dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa keterbukaan informasi publik.
tujuan daripada keterbukaan informasi publik adalah dalam rangka mengawal
kebebasan informasi sebagai falsafah Hak Asasi Manusia dalam generasi ketiga.
Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teori Hukum, teori Politik Hukum Nasional,
Teori Pembagian Kekuasaan dan Kekuasaan Keempat, kerangka konsep yang
digunakan yaitu peradilan administrasi dalam perspektif politik hukum dan
Kebebasan atas informasi sebagai HAM.
Hasil dari penelitian menunjukan bahwa komisi informasi ditempatkan
layaknya peradilan tingkat pertama karena hasil dari putusan dapat dimintakan
banding kepada PTUN, dalam proses di PTUN menggunakan hukum acara
tersendiri yang menempatkan PTUN sebagai peradilan Banding. atas hasil
penelitian maka terdapat suatu paradigma baru dalam sistem peradilan di
Indonesia. Gagasan yang diambil dari penelitian adalah dengan
mengkonsolidasikan sistem penyelesaian sengketa informasi publik dalam
peradilan khusus dibawah PTUN, Konsep demikian digunakan agar dapat
mengawal dan memperkuat sistem hukum dan peradilan di Indonesia.

ABSTRACT
This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions
the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission
of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute
public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to
guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third
generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,
Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the
conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective
and freedom of information as a human rights.
Results of the research showed that the commission of information like
first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the
Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural
law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the
research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea
from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in
a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order
to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia.;This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions
the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission
of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute
public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to
guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third
generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,
Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the
conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective
and freedom of information as a human rights.
Results of the research showed that the commission of information like
first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the
Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural
law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the
research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea
from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in
a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order
to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia.;This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions
the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission
of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute
public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to
guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third
generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,
Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the
conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective
and freedom of information as a human rights.
Results of the research showed that the commission of information like
first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the
Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural
law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the
research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea
from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in
a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order
to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia., This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions
the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission
of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute
public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to
guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third
generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,
Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the
conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective
and freedom of information as a human rights.
Results of the research showed that the commission of information like
first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the
Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural
law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the
research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea
from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in
a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order
to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia.]"
2015
T43067
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Wan Azalan Ahmad
Singapore: FT law & Tax Asia Pacific, 1995
342 AHM
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Endicott, Timothy
"Administrative Law explains the constitutional principles of the subject to enable students to apply them to the problems of administrative law and understand this complex branch of public law. The author's lively and analytical style encourages the development of a critical, questioning approach. "
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015
342 END a
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989
341.55 DOC
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Mala Hayati
"ABSTRAK
Dalam negara hukum modern (negara kesejahteraan), diskresi yang
dilakukan oleh pejabat administrasi negara merupakan hal yang tak terhindarkan.
Dinamisnya tugas-tugas administrasi negara serta keterbatasan peraturan
perundang-undangan dalam merespon kemajuan masyarakat menjadikan diskresi
acapkali dilakukan dalam menyelesaikan masalah-masalah yang timbul.
Walaupun diskresi sering diartikan sebagai kewenang bebas atau kebebasan dalam
bertindak, namun sejatinya penggunaan disresi dalam administrasi negara tidak
benar-benar bebas, tetap harus memperhatikan peraturan perundang-undangan
yang berlaku dan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik. Kedua hal tersebut
merupakan acuan ketika menggunakan wewenang diskresi agar tidak menjadi
penyalahgunaan wewenang dan sewenang-wenang yang justru malah merugikan
masyarakat. Selain itu, pejabat administrasi negara pun harus dapat
mempertanggungjawabkan diskresi yang telah dilakukan, tanggung jawab ini
berupa tanggung jawab moral dan tanggung jawab hukum.

ABSTRACT
In modern state law( welfare state ), discretion by administrative officials
is inevitable. Dynamic state administration tasks as well as the limitations of
legislation in response to the progress of society often make discretionary done in
solving the problems that arise. Although discretion is often interpreted as free
authority or freedom to act, but actually the use of discretion in the administration
officials is not really free, but still have to pay attention to the laws in force and
the general principles of good governance. Both of these are a reference when
using discretionary powers so as not to be an abuse of authority and arbitrary that
it actually detrimental to society. In addition, administration officials must be
accountable discretion that has been made, the liability is a moral liability and
legal liability."
2014
T38720
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
<<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   >>