Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Aliran filsafat hukum ini dipelopori oleh H.L.A. Hart dikenal dengan filsafat hukum analitik. Bagaimanakah filsafat hukum menurut H.L.A. Hart. Refleksi terhadap beroperasinya suatu sistem hukum memperlihatkan masalah-masalah lain, oleh karena itu adalah jelas bahwa hukum adalah suatu cara mempengaruhi perilaku manusia secara erat berkaitan dengan dan dalam banyak hal tergantung pada penggunaan atau ancaman kekuatan disatu pihak dan pada moralitas dilain pihak. Menurut Hart "rules of recognition' memiliki suatu makna kemasyarakatan faktual. Ia berkenaan dengan penentuan, apakah suatu tata hukum dapat diidentifikasikan demikian dapat diterima secara faktual dalam suatu kemasyarakatan konkret?. Hal demikian dapat ditetapkan dengan suatu analitis empirik. Bagi Hart hal ini lebih sedikit bernuansa karena ia pada akhirnya menerima sejenis minimum kandungan hukum alam, tetapi lebih jauh itu juga tidak kite temukan padanya apa yang dapat diartikan dengan keadilan padanya juga tidak jelas. Dengan demikian pemisahan hukum dan moral dengan situasi demikian dapat dipandang sebagai bentuk emansipasi dan kemajuan. "

"The Natural Moral Law argues that the good can be known and that therefore the moral law, which serves as a basis for human choice, can be understood. Proceeding historically through ancient, modern and postmodern thinkers, Owen Anderson studies beliefs about the good and how it is known, and how such beliefs shape claims about the moral law. The focal challenge is whether the skepticism of postmodern thinkers can be answered in a way that preserves knowledge claims about the good. Considering the failures of modern thinkers to correctly articulate reason and the good and how postmodern thinkers are responding to these failures, Anderson argues that there are identifiable patterns of thinking about what is good, some of which lead to false dichotomies. The book concludes with a consideration of how a moral law might look if the good is correctly identified"-- Provided by publisher.Contents Machine generated contents note: 1. The postmodern challenge: from modernity to postmodernity; 2. Traditional natural law: differences in Aristotle and Aquinas; 3. Patterns in historical thinking about the good; 4. The challenge of modernity: religious wars and the need for universal law; 5. The challenges of naturalism: legal realism or natural law; 6. Objectivity without a metaphysical foundation; 7. Contemporary natural law: practical rationality and legal opinions; 8. Natural law as a theory with metaphysical baggage: postmodern law; 9. Natural law as the moral law; 10. Natural moral law in a postmodern world."

"The rule of law is a valuable human achievement. It is valuable not only instrumentally, but also for its own sake as a significant aspect of social justice. Only in a society that enjoys the rule of law is it possible for people to regard one another as fellow free citizens; no one the master of anyone else. Nevertheless, the rule of law is poorly understood. In this book, Frank Lovett develops a rigorous conception of the rule of law that is grounded in legal positivism, and offers a civic republican argument for its value in terms of freedom from domination. Bridging persistent methodological gaps that divide legal philosophy, social science, and political theory, Lovett demonstrates how insights from all three can be united in a single powerful theory. This book will appeal to anyone interested in the rule of law, including scholars, legal officials, and policy-makers."