Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk menganalisis pro-poor growth di Indonesia. Terkait dengan hal tersebut, maka tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa pengaruh pertumbuhan ekonomi terhadap ketimpangan pendapatan dan kemiskinan, serta menganalisa apakah pertumbuhan ekonomi tersebut berpihak pada penduduk miskin (pro-poor growth). Analisa dilakukan melalui data panel 26 propinsi di Indonesia periode 1980-2008. Hasil analisa menunjukkan bahwa pertumbuhan ekonomi signifikan berpengaruh terhadap ketimpangan pada periode 1980-2008 dan 1999-2008. Namun demikian, pengurangan kemiskinan kurang didorong oleh efek ketimpangan pendapatan. Pengurangan kemiskinan akibat perubahan ketimpangan pendapatan yang ditimbulkan pertumbuhan ekonomi hanya terjadi pada periode 1999-2008. Sedangkan pertumbuhan ekonomi pada seluruh periode, signifikan berpengaruh terhadap pengurangan kemiskinan. Meskipun demikian, elastisitas bruto dan neto kemiskinan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi semakin tidak elastis. Sementara itu, hasil perhitungan Pro Poor Growth Index (PPGI) menunjukkan bahwa pertumbuhan ekonomi yang terjadi di semua periode tergolong pro-poor growth. Sayangnya, nilai elastisitas kemiskinan (baik bruto maupun neto) terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi tergolong rendah. Selain itu, pengaruh pertumbuhan ekonomi terhadap kemiskinan melalui efek ketimpangan pendapatan pun tidak besar. Oleh sebab itu, pemerintah perlu mempertahankan pro-poor growth yang telah dicapai dengan memberikan perhatian pada upaya peningkatkan pengaruh pertumbuhan ekonomi terhadap pengurangan kemiskinan dan mendorong pemerataan distribusi pendapatan sehingga mendorong pengurangan kemiskinan.

---

This research aimed to analyze pro-poor growth in Indonesia. Related with it, this research attempts to analyze impact of economic growth on income inequality and poverty. This research also analyze whether the economic growth has respect to poor people (pro-poor growth). Analysis is conducted through panel data of 26 provinces in Indonesia for 1980-2008 periods. The result shows that economic growth is significantly affecting the income inequality for period of 1980-2008 and 1999-2008. Nevertheless, poverty reduction is not driven sufficiently by income inequality effect. The poverty reduction caused by change of the inequality by economic growth only happens in 1999-2008. Economic growth in all period is significantly affecting poverty reduction. Even tough, gross and net elasticity of poverty to economic growth become more inelastic. In the other side, calculation of Pro Poor Growth Index (PPGI) shows that economic growth in all period is included to be pro-poor growth. Unfortunately, poverty elasticity (either gross or net) to economic growth is low. Besides, impact of economic growth on poverty through income inequality effect is not high. Therefore, government needs to maintain achieved pro-poor growth by paying attention on effort to increase economic growth effect on the poverty reduction and support equal income distribution in order to stimulate poverty alleviation."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah pembangunan ekonomi di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah selama periode 2004-2010 sudah pro poor growth atau belum dengan menggunakan metode GIC dan metode PPGI serta sektor-sektor ekonomi apa yang mampu mengurangi kemiskinan. Berdasarkan data Susenas dan PDRB Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah serta menggunakan analisa GIC dan regresi data panel ditemukan bahwa pembangunan ekonomi di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah selama periode 2004-2010 sudah pro poor growth melalui metode PPGI namun melalui metode GIC belum pro poor growth. Dan dari 14 kabupaten/kota di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah, hanya Kabupaten Sukamara yang pembangunan ekonominya sudah pro poor growth.Sementara itu di tingkat Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah, sektor pertambangan dan penggalian, industri pengolahan, sektor bangunan serta sektor keuangan, persewaan dan jasa perusahaan merupakan sektor-sektor ekonomi yang secara signifikan mengurangi kemiskinan, sebaliknya sektor listrik, gas dan air bersih justru meningkatkan kemiskinan. Sedangkan di tingkat sepuluh kabupaten yang belum pro poor growth, sektor pertanian, sektor pertambangan dan penggalian, industri pengolahan, sektor bangunan, sektor keuangan, persewaan dan jasa perusahaan serta sektor jasa-jasa merupakan sektor-sektor ekonomi yang secara signifikan mengurangi kemiskinan, di sisi lain sektor listrik, gas dan air bersih meningkatkan kemiskinan.

---

This study aimed to determine whether the economic development in Central Kalimantan during the period 2004-2010 has been pro poor growth or not by using GIC and PPGI and economic sectors could be capable of reducing poverty. Based on data of Susenas and GDP Central Kalimantan Province and using GIC and regression analysis of panel data found that economic development in Central Kalimantan during the period 2004-2010 has been pro-poor growth through PPGI but through the GIC has not been pro-poor growth. And of the 14 districts/municipalities in Central Kalimantan, only an economic development Sukamara District has been pro-poor growth.

Meanwhile in Central Kalimantan Provincial level, mining and quarrying sector, manufacturing industry sector, construction sector and the financial, leasing and business services sector are the economic sectors that significantly reduce poverty, otherwise the electricity, gas and water supply sector actually increase poverty. While at the ten districts that have not been pro-poor growth, agriculture sector, mining and quarrying sector, manufacturing industry sector, construction sector, financial, leasing and business services sector and the services sector is the economic sectors that significantly reduce poverty, in the another sector of electricity, gas and water supply increased poverty."

"Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji apakah pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia dikategorikan sebagai pro-poor growth (berpihak kepada orang miskin). Thesis ini akan dianalisis melalui bagaimana mekanisme pertumbuhan ekonomi mempengaruhi kemiskinan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan data panel yang disusun dengan data pada tingkat provinsi untuk periode 2004 – 2010. Selanjutnya, data panel tersebut dipergunakan untuk mengestimasi model ekonometrik yang memungkinkan kita mengetahui dampak dari pertumbuhan ekonomi, ketimpangan, pengeluaran pemerintah, dan kemampuan fiskal pada tingkat kemiskinan. Adapun variabel kontrol terdiri dari koefisien Gini, Per Kapita Produk Domestik Regional Bruto (PDRB per kapita), pengeluaran pemerintah, dan sumber pendapatan sendiri.Hasil penelitian ini memiliki implikasi pada kebijakan pemerintah. Pertama, hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pertumbuhan ekonomi yang baik ternyata dapat menanggulangi kemiskinan. Dengan demikian, Pemerintah harus memformulasikan kebijakan yang dapat meningkatkan pertumbuhan ekonomi yang berpihakak pada masyarakat miskin. Selain itu, bukti empiris menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kemiskinan lebih responsif terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi dari pada distribusi pendapatan (gini ratio). Kedua, pengaruh pengeluaran pemerintah terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi sangat bervariasi. Belanja pemerintah untuk pendidikan dan kesehatan memiliki dampak yang signifikan terhadap pengentasan kemiskinan melalui ketidaksetaraan pendapatan berkurang, sedangkan belanja publik pada perlindungan sosial tidak signifikan berkontribusi dalam mengurangi angka kemiskinan. Selanjutnya, kemampuan fiskal di masing-masing provinsi sangat diperlukan untuk meningkatkan pengentasan kemiskinan di wilayhanya.Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa pertumbuhan ekonomi diperlukan untuk meningkatkan efektivitas penanggulangan kemiskinan. Selain itu, untuk mempercepat pengurangan kemiskinan di Indonesia, pertumbuhan ekonomi yang berkelanjutan juga harus didukung melalui investasi sumber daya manusia, serta merancang dan menerapkan program pengurangan kemiskinan yang berpihak pada masyarakat miskin. Untuk kasus Indonesia, pertumbuhan ekonomi selama periode 2004-2010 dapat disimpulkan sebagai pro-poor growth.

---

The main purpose of this study is to examine whether economic growth in Indonesia is categorised as pro-poor growth. It will be analysed through how economic growth affects poverty. To address this research, we will conduct the study using panel data. It consists of province-level data from 2004 - 2010 to estimate an econometric model that allows us to know the impact of economic growth, inequality, government spending, and fiscal capability on poverty rate. Therefore, the set of control variables consists of the Gini coefficient, per capita Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP), government spending, and own income resources.

The estimated results of this study have important policy implications. First, the finding shows that economic growth is good to enhance poverty reduction; government therefore should consider to rising up economic growth benefiting for the poor. In addition, empirical evidence suggests that the poverty headcount ratio in Indonesia is more responsive on economic growth than on income distribution. Second, the effect of government expenditures varies for different type of spending. Government spending on education and health has significant impact on poverty alleviation through reduced income inequality; while public expenditure on social protection is insignificantly contribute to decrease poverty rate. Finally, the fiscal capability in each province is required to enhance poverty eradication.

Further, economic growth is needed to enhance the effectiveness of poverty reduction. Moreover, sustained growth should be accompanied by encouraging in human capital investment to accelerate poverty reduction. In addition, designing and implementing pro poor poverty reduction program should be done to accelerate poverty alleviation. Finally, this result suggests that economic growth during period 2004-2010 in Indonesia can be concluded as pro-poor growth"

"Pertumbuhan ekonomi yang tinggi di Provinsi Lampung tidak secara otomatis berdampak kepada rendahnya kemiskinan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh pertumbuhan ekonomi terhadap kemiskinan di Provinsi Lampung. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan data panel dari 10 kabupaten/ kota se-Provinsi Lampung selama periode 2002-2010. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berasal dari publikasi BPS. Untuk mengetahui pengaruh pertumbuhan ekonomi terhadap kemiskinan dibangun model regresi data panel menggunakan metode fixed effect. Hasil estimasi menunjukkan peningkatan pertumbuhan ekonomi dan pendidikan berpengaruh menurunkan kemiskinan, sedangkan peningkatan jumlah penduduk dan inflasi berpengaruh meningkatkan kemiskinan.

---

The high economic growth in Lampung province does not automatically have an impact on poverty alleviation. This study aimed to analyze the effect of economic growth on poverty in Lampung province. The analyzes were using panel data from 10 districts in Lampung province during the period 2002-2010. The data used in this study is derived from BPS the publication. To determine the effect of economic growth on poverty using the fixed effect model. The estimates indicate economic growth and education reduce poverty, whereas growth of population and inflation increase poverty."

"ABSTRAKDalam konsep pertumbuhan ekonomi yang pro-poor, pertumbuhan yang disertai dengan pemerataan pendapatan akan mempercepat proses pengentasan kemiskinan. Dengan menggunakan data survey pengeluaran rumah tangga dan berbagai indikator ekonomi, penelitian ini akan menguji apakah pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia pada periode 2005 sampai dengan 2013 dapat dikategorikan sebagai pertumbuhan yang pro-poor. Penelitian akan menggunakan dua metode, yakni metode Growth Incidence Curve GIC dan metode Pro-Poor Growth Index PPGI . Metode GIC menunjukkan hasil empiris bahwa pertumbuhan ekonomi pada periode yang diobservasi tidak bisa dikatakan sebagai pertumbuhan ekonomi yang pro-poor. Kurva GIC memperlihatkan bahwa rumah tangga lsquo;kaya rsquo; justru menikmati peningkatan pengeluaran untuk konsumsi dibanding rumah tangga lsquo;miskin rsquo;.Lebih jauh lagi, ketika menggunakan metode PPGI, dapat disimpulkan bahwa pertumbuhan ekonomi, ketimpangan, dan interaksi antara pertumbuhan ekonomi dan ketimpangan berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap kemiskinan di Indonesia. Hasil empiris juga menunjukkan bahwa dari tiga sektor yang diteliti, yakni sektor industri, sektor pertanian, dan sektor jasa; sektor industri berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap upaya pengentasan kemiskinan, sedangkan sektor pertanian justru secara signifikan berkorelasi negatif dengan pengurangan kemiskinan. Sementara itu, sektor jasa tidak terbukti berkontribusi dalam menurunkan angka kemiskinan. Selain itu, uji statistik juga menyatakan bahwa pengeluaran pemerintah di bidang pendidikan dan kesehatan tidak berkontribusi dalam mengurangi kemiskinan.

---

ABSTRACTIn the concept of pro poor growth, economic growth accompanied by fair income distribution will accelerate the rate of poverty reduction. By employing extensive data of household expenditures and other economic indicators, the study will examine the performance of economic growth in Indonesia whether it has been pro poor over the period 2005 2013. We employ two methods in this article, Growth Incidence Curve GIC method, and Pro Poor Growth Index PPGI method. By applying the GIC method, our empirical results indicate that economic growth in Indonesia has not been pro poor during the observed period. The curve shows that the highest income population enjoys increased consumption more than the poorest population.Furthermore, PPGI method has revealed that economic growth, inequality, and an interaction term between economic growth and inequality have been significant to influence poverty incidence in Indonesia. Our empirical result also reveals that among manufacturing, agriculture, and services sector it was manufacturing that has successfully reduced the number of the poor, while agriculture unexpectedly had a devastating impact on the number of poor people. The services sector, meanwhile, had not contributed to poverty alleviation. Furthermore, none of the government spending in education and health that significantly contributes to poverty alleviation. "

"this study aims to test and demonstrate empirically the influence of special autonomy fund (DOK), the general allocation fund (DAU) and PAD allegedly not necessarily improve economic growth. This study analyzed the partial influence of DOK, DAU and PAD to conomic growth in Aceh province.this stady covers 23 districts / cities and one countained in the Aceh province. The data in this study is a secondary data countained in the office of financial management aceh (DPKA), the central bureau of statistics provinces of Aceh and other sources that can be accounted for.Based on the results of data processing show that partially DOK and DAU significant effect on economic growth in Aceh. While variable PAD negatively affect economic growth in the province. The most dominant variable is DOK, this due to the use of DOK has been set for a sector that has a greater impetus to economic growth, such as infrastructure, health an education.The results date processing, also indicates that the variable DOK, DAU and PAD simultaneously significant effect on economic growth in Aceh."

"[Kemiskinan merupakan momok bagi pembangunan suatu negara. Selain menghambat pertumbuhan ekonomi, kemiskinan juga dapat menimbulkan masalah multidimensi. Untuk memecahkan masalah kemiskinan, pemerintah berupaya menggalakkan berbagai macam program pengentasan kemiskinan. Saat ini, Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Community Driven Development-CDD)telah menjadi salah satu program yang sering dilakukan oleh negara-negara berkembang untuk mengelola tingkat kemiskinan. Konsep dasarnya sangat sederhana, yaitu pemberdayaan masyarakat, khususnya masyarakat miskin. Di Indonesia, pemerintah menerapkan Program CDD melalui Program NasionalPemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) sebagai dasar dari kampanye pengurangan kemiskinan. Dalam pelaksanaannya, program PNPM membutuhkan keikutsertaan masyarakat miskin untuk berpartisipasi dalam perencanaan, pelaksanaan, monitoring dan evaluasi program. Sebuah studi dari keberhasilan PNPM dilakukan tak lama setelah program ini diluncurkan pada tahun 2007. Hasil studi terbaru menyebutkan bahwa PNPMcenderung dapat meningkatkan pertumbuhan ekonomi yang mampu mengurangi jumlah orang miskin (pertumbuhan pro-kemiskinan). Namun ironisnya, program ini dihentikan oleh rezim baru di awal tahun 2015. Berangkat dari masalah ini, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas dari PNPM sebagai cara untuk mencapai pertumbuhan yang pro-kemiskinan (pro-poor growth). Cakupan makalah penelitian ini adalah merumuskan peran PNPM di tingkat nasional mengingat sebagian besar penelitian sebelumnya hanya terfokus pada daerahdaerahtertentu. Studi ini menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa PNPM adalah instrumen yang bisa diterapkan untuk mencapai pertumbuhan yang prokemiskinan (pertumbuhan yang menguntungkan orang miskin). Dengan membatasi definisi kemiskinan secara absolut, setiap peningkatan dana PNPMyang menyertai pertumbuhan ekonomi, cenderung akan mengurangi kemiskinan.

---

Poverty is a scourge for development of a country. Besides inhibiting the economic growth, poverty may also cause multidimensional problems. Thus, to solve poverty matters, many governments attempt to promote poverty alleviation programs in their countries. Currently, Community-Driven Development (CDD) Program has become one of the systems which is often practiced by developing countries in order to manage the poverty rate. Its basic concept is very simple. It empowers the communities, especially the poor, to unleash them from the shackles of poverty. In Indonesia, the government implements CDD Program through the so-called Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) as

the basis of the poverty reduction campaign. In its implementation, PNPM program requires the poor communities to get involved in such actions as participation in planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the

programs. A study of the success of the PNPM to eradicate poverty was conducted shortly after the program was launched in 2007. The results of the latest studies suggested that the PNPM will likely be able to reduce the number of poor people in Indonesia. Nevertheless, after running for several years, the program was terminated by the new regime at the beginning of 2015. Departing from this issue, this study aims to investigate the effectiveness of PNPM as a means of alleviating poverty. Since most of the previous studies only focused on certain areas, this research paper is trying to formulate the role of PNPM at the national level. This study has come up with a conclusion that the PNPM is a workable instrument to achieve pro-poor growth, the growth which favours the poor. By limiting the definition of poverty in absolute terms, any increase in the PNPM funds, accompanying the economic growth, will likely reduce poverty more.;Poverty is a scourge for development of a country. Besides inhibiting the

economic growth, poverty may also cause multidimensional problems. Thus, to

solve poverty matters, many governments attempt to promote poverty alleviation

programs in their countries. Currently, Community-Driven Development (CDD)

Program has become one of the systems which is often practiced by developing

countries in order to manage the poverty rate. Its basic concept is very simple. It

empowers the communities, especially the poor, to unleash them from the

shackles of poverty. In Indonesia, the government implements CDD Program

through the so-called Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) as

the basis of the poverty reduction campaign. In its implementation, PNPM

program requires the poor communities to get involved in such actions as

participation in planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the

programs.

A study of the success of the PNPM to eradicate poverty was conducted

shortly after the program was launched in 2007. The results of the latest studies

suggested that the PNPM will likely be able to reduce the number of poor people

in Indonesia. Nevertheless, after running for several years, the program was

terminated by the new regime at the beginning of 2015. Departing from this issue,

this study aims to investigate the effectiveness of PNPM as a means of alleviating

poverty. Since most of the previous studies only focused on certain areas, this

research paper is trying to formulate the role of PNPM at the national level. This

study has come up with a conclusion that the PNPM is a workable instrument to

achieve pro-poor growth, the growth which favours the poor. By limiting the

definition of poverty in absolute terms, any increase in the PNPM funds,

accompanying the economic growth, will likely reduce poverty more;Poverty is a scourge for development of a country. Besides inhibiting the

economic growth, poverty may also cause multidimensional problems. Thus, to

solve poverty matters, many governments attempt to promote poverty alleviation

programs in their countries. Currently, Community-Driven Development (CDD)

Program has become one of the systems which is often practiced by developing

countries in order to manage the poverty rate. Its basic concept is very simple. It

empowers the communities, especially the poor, to unleash them from the

shackles of poverty. In Indonesia, the government implements CDD Program

through the so-called Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) as

the basis of the poverty reduction campaign. In its implementation, PNPM

program requires the poor communities to get involved in such actions as

participation in planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the

programs.

A study of the success of the PNPM to eradicate poverty was conducted

shortly after the program was launched in 2007. The results of the latest studies

suggested that the PNPM will likely be able to reduce the number of poor people

in Indonesia. Nevertheless, after running for several years, the program was

terminated by the new regime at the beginning of 2015. Departing from this issue,

this study aims to investigate the effectiveness of PNPM as a means of alleviating

poverty. Since most of the previous studies only focused on certain areas, this

research paper is trying to formulate the role of PNPM at the national level. This

study has come up with a conclusion that the PNPM is a workable instrument to

achieve pro-poor growth, the growth which favours the poor. By limiting the

definition of poverty in absolute terms, any increase in the PNPM funds,

accompanying the economic growth, will likely reduce poverty more;Poverty is a scourge for development of a country. Besides inhibiting the

economic growth, poverty may also cause multidimensional problems. Thus, to

solve poverty matters, many governments attempt to promote poverty alleviation

programs in their countries. Currently, Community-Driven Development (CDD)

Program has become one of the systems which is often practiced by developing

countries in order to manage the poverty rate. Its basic concept is very simple. It

empowers the communities, especially the poor, to unleash them from the

shackles of poverty. In Indonesia, the government implements CDD Program

through the so-called Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) as

the basis of the poverty reduction campaign. In its implementation, PNPM

program requires the poor communities to get involved in such actions as

participation in planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the

programs.

A study of the success of the PNPM to eradicate poverty was conducted

shortly after the program was launched in 2007. The results of the latest studies

suggested that the PNPM will likely be able to reduce the number of poor people

in Indonesia. Nevertheless, after running for several years, the program was

terminated by the new regime at the beginning of 2015. Departing from this issue,

this study aims to investigate the effectiveness of PNPM as a means of alleviating

poverty. Since most of the previous studies only focused on certain areas, this

research paper is trying to formulate the role of PNPM at the national level. This

study has come up with a conclusion that the PNPM is a workable instrument to

achieve pro-poor growth, the growth which favours the poor. By limiting the

definition of poverty in absolute terms, any increase in the PNPM funds,

accompanying the economic growth, will likely reduce poverty more, Poverty is a scourge for development of a country. Besides inhibiting the

economic growth, poverty may also cause multidimensional problems. Thus, to

solve poverty matters, many governments attempt to promote poverty alleviation

programs in their countries. Currently, Community-Driven Development (CDD)

Program has become one of the systems which is often practiced by developing

countries in order to manage the poverty rate. Its basic concept is very simple. It

empowers the communities, especially the poor, to unleash them from the

shackles of poverty. In Indonesia, the government implements CDD Program

through the so-called Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) as

the basis of the poverty reduction campaign. In its implementation, PNPM

program requires the poor communities to get involved in such actions as

participation in planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the

programs.

A study of the success of the PNPM to eradicate poverty was conducted

shortly after the program was launched in 2007. The results of the latest studies

suggested that the PNPM will likely be able to reduce the number of poor people

in Indonesia. Nevertheless, after running for several years, the program was

terminated by the new regime at the beginning of 2015. Departing from this issue,

this study aims to investigate the effectiveness of PNPM as a means of alleviating

poverty. Since most of the previous studies only focused on certain areas, this

research paper is trying to formulate the role of PNPM at the national level. This

study has come up with a conclusion that the PNPM is a workable instrument to

achieve pro-poor growth, the growth which favours the poor. By limiting the

definition of poverty in absolute terms, any increase in the PNPM funds,

accompanying the economic growth, will likely reduce poverty more]"

"ABSTRACTPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1). Mengetahui pengaruh pengeluaran pemeritah pada sektor pendidikan, kesehatan dan infrastruktur terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi dan indeks pembangunan manusia (IPM) di indonesia, (2). Mengetahui pengaruh ekonomi terhadap IPM, dan (3). Mengetahui pengaruh pengeluaran pemerintah pada sektor pendidikan, kesehatan dan infrestruktur terhadap IPM, baik secara langsung maupun melalui pertumbuhan ekonomi. Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel 20 propinsi yang dipilih dengan teknik simple random sampling yang kemudian dibagi kedalam 2 kelompok, yaitu kelompok daerah dengan angka IPM tinggi dan daerah dengan IPM rendah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adlah analisis jalur. Sebagai pendukung, juga dilakukan uji beda rata-rata untuk mengetahui ada tidaknya perbedaan rata-rata secara statistik terhadap 2 kelompok tersebut. Hasil estimasi menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan respon diantara 2 kelompok daerah tersebut. pada kelompok daerah dengan angka IPMtinggi, terliat bahwa pengeluaran kesehatan dan infrastruktur mempunyai pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap IPM melalui pertumbuhan ekonomi, sedangkan pada kelompok dengan angka IPM rendah terlihat bahwa hanya pengeluaran pendidikan yang mempunyai pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap angka IPM. adapun pertumbuhan ekonomi, terlihat menunjukkan engaruh yang positif dan signifikan terhadap IPM. Hal ini terjadi pada kedua kelompok daerah, baik kelompok daerah dangan IPM tinggi maupun IPM rendah."

"Proverty level of Indonesia remains high while the economy experiences relatively high and steady growth. The asymetry investigated,probing the poverty and economic growth - structure linkages at sectoral level...."

"Pada fungsi produksi Cobb-Douglas, faktor A(t) tidak hanya mencerminkan teknologi namun juga perbedaan kontribusi sumber daya dan institusi lintas wilayah dan waktu (Lin dan Liu, 2000). Penelitian ini mengasumsikan bahwa A(t) dicerminkan oleh belanja daerah sebagai parameter desentralisasi dan belanja pemerintah pusat di daerah. Sehingga penelitian ini tidak hanya menguji pengaruh belanja daerah namun juga pengaruh belanja pemerintah pusat di daerah terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi daerah. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk menguji hubungan antara belanja pemerintah pusat di daerah dan belanja daerah. Dengan menggunakan data panel kabupaten/kota di Indonesia untuk periode 2010-2019 dan metode fixed effect model (FEM), hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa belanja desentralisasi yang diukur dengan belanja daerah serta belanja pemerintah pusat di daerah secara bersama-sama berpengaruh positif terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi daerah di Indonesia. Selanjutnya, belanja pemerintah pusat di daerah juga memiliki korelasi positif dengan belanja daerah kabupaten/kota di Indonesia.

---

In Cobb-Douglas production function, the term A(t) reflects not only technology but also difference in resource endowments and institutions across regions and over time (Lin & Liu, 2000). This study assumes that A(t) is reflected by local expenditure as decentralization measure and central expenditure spent in local. This study examines not only the effect of local expenditure but also the effect of central expenditure spent in local to economic growth. Using panel data of regencies/cities in Indonesia for 2010-2019 period and fixed effect model (FEM) methodology, the result shows that decentralization expenditure as measured by local expenditure, together with central expenditure spent in local has positive effect on local economic growth in Indonesia. Furthermore, central expenditure spent in local also has positive correlation with local expenditure of regencies/cities in Indonesia."