Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"A good model government is government that has a high level of organizational effectiveness related to policy formulation and policy implementation in reality. Therefore bureaucracy development as an implementer instution in order to achieve governemnt objective is an imperative necessity...."

"Hingga saat ini Indonesia masih menghadapi masalah korupsi atas keuangan negara yang masih tinggi meskipun upaya perbaikan sistem laporan keuangan yang berkualitas sudah diterapkan. Di sisi lain, dengan sistem desentralisasi dan pemilihan langsung atas lembaga legislatif dan eksekutif pemerintahan, divided government akan mendorong terjadinya proses checks and balances yang juga dapat mengurangi korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat peran sistem pelaporan keuangan sebagai bentuk dari good governance dan peran divided government terhadap korupsi. Dengan tidak menggunakan variabel korupsi yang berupa persepsi karena bersifat subjektif dan cenderung bias, studi ini menggunakan data korupsi yang bersifat inkracht sehingga dapat menggambarkan kasus korupsi yang sebenarnya terjadi.Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa good governance dengan indikator opini BPK yang diperoleh pemerintah kabupaten/kota belum bersifat substantif menggambarkan penggunaan keuangan negara. Akibatnya korupsi masih tetap terjadi pada wilayah yang sudah memperoleh opini terbaik. Sedangkan divided government yang seharusnya mendorong adanya checks and balances justru memunculkan ruang untuk negosiasi dan membuat peluang terjadinya korupsi semakin besar. Terlepas dari hal itu, upaya pemberantasan korupsi pada era pertama presiden Jokowi lebih baik dibandingkan periode sebelumnya.

---

Indonesia still faces the problem of corruption in the country's finances which are still high even though efforts to improve the quality of the financial report system have been implemented. Furthermore, with a decentralized and direct election system of the legislative and executive institutions, divided government will encourage the process of checks and balances which can reduce corruption. This study aims to investigate the role of financial reporting systems as a representation of good governance and the role of divided government against corruption. Instead of using corruption perception variables which are subjective and susceptible to be biased, this study uses inkracht corruption data that can describe corruption cases that actually occur.

The results of the study show that good governance approached by Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan - BPK) opinion indicators obtained by district/city governments have not been substantively describing the use of state finances. As a result, corruption still occurs in the regions even for those which have obtained the best opinion. Whereas divided government, which should encourage checks and balances, promotes situations for negotiations and makes the chances of corruption occurring even greater. Despite on that fact, efforts to eradicate corruption in President Jokowi's first era were better than the previous government."

"Isi tesis ini membahas mengenai kepemimpinan dalam tata kelola pemerintahan yang merupakan suatu factor penentu keberhasilan atau kegagalan suatu pemerintahan. Baik itu pemerintahan pusat maupun di daerah. Tanpa kepemimpinan yang baik hampir mustahil suatu organisasi, terutama organisasi publik, dapat berhasil mencapat tujuan dan cita-cita yang diharapkan. Keberhasilan kepemimpinan dalam suatu organisasi pemerintahan tidak hanya ditentukan oleh faktor dukungan politik yang kuat ataupuan kepintaran individu pemimpin, namun juga dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor. Faktor penentu ini dapat berasal baik eksternal organisasi ataupun eksternal pemimpin sebagai individu. Dan juga dari faktor internal, baik internal organisasi ataupun internal pemimpin sebagai individu. Dalam penelitian ini ditunjukkan suatu kondisi yang mempengaruhi kegagalan dan keberhasilan pemimpin pemerintahan dalam melakukan penata kelolaan suatu organisasi pemerintahan di tingkat daerah.

---

This study discussed the role of leadership in governance as a determining factor for the success of a government—both central and regional governments. Without good leadership, it is almost impossible for an organisation, especially a public organisation, to achieve the expected goals and ideals. Leadership success in a government organisation is not only determined by solid political support or the intelligence of individual leaders but is also influenced by various factors. These determinants can come from external, both external to the organisation and external to the leader as an individual. And also, from internal factors, both internal organisations and internal leaders as individuals. The research shows a condition that affects the failure and success of government leaders in managing a government organisation."

"The amendments through Indonesian Constitution of i945 (UUD I945) have impacted to various change including to government system. The change an the government system has came about UUD 1945 (at pre-amendments) is the semi-presidential then it's become hilly presidential system after amended. The -author here also scrutinizes on the government system which had appeared in not only the constitutional level but also on the practice in the national implementations. The author also presents her advices for the legislator members to deeper grasped toward basic concepts which had been exercised by UUD l 945 post-amendments, including the presidential system. its directed to the presidential power to make legislations will not disregard to UUD 1945."

"This final assignment is observing about government system and institutions relationship in Indonesia, since Soeharto?s era until Reformation era. Its research is focused on presidentialism practice in Indonesia, study case of SBY-JK government (October 2004 ? March 2008). This objective study is based on the theories of presidentialism, democracy, political party, and presidential leadership especially in the third world with qualitative literature approach.Executive and legislative institution in Indonesia, had a dynamic relationship since Soeharto?s era. That situation made a problem in presidentialism practice. Within Soeharto?s power, new order era succeed to make executive heavy on the system. It means, Soeharto controlled the government system and became a centralistic of authority. On the other hand, legislative was powerless. This executive heavy caused dissatisfaction on the accountability, transparency, and mandate for the people. President is voted by legislative but in practical, executive was so powerful. Many people had realized then, if there were a disappointment on the government and political practice for 32 years of Soeharto?s era. After that, General economic distress was happened on 1997 in Indonesia within global monetary crisis. In addition, the government was controlled by corruption, collusion, and nepotism politician. As a result, people pushed the reform in 1998.Reformation 1998, has made a renewal in institutional relationship between executive, legislative, and judicative, especially President - House of Representative. With amendment UUD 1945, liberalization of political parties was occurred, House of Representative?s authority has been empowered, and all of the problems were started to be fixed. In the next four generation of President (B.J. Habibie, Gus Dur, Megawati, SBY), Indonesia had implemented those reform, but still adjusted. Until the election in 2004 and almost 10 years, reformation still has had a problem in presidentialism practice.The election in 2004 (within separated election and multiparty) was the new era for President who would be more powerful because of the direct election, but on the contrary, the combination between presidentialism and multiparty was a complicated combination. President faced with coalition party, minority president, and cohabitation in executive leadership. The fact, SBY-JK controls the government with weak management/policy and leadership of SBY-JK inside. So that, many problems which are faced by the government cannot be solved effectively/efficiently, at least during this research is being done."

"Konsep negara hukum sosial membuka ruang diskresi bagi pemerintah secara lebih luas. Hal tersebut merupakan pilihan kontekstual mengingat kselerasi kebutuhan rakyat yang semakin meluas secara kualitatif maupun kuantitatif dan membutuhkan peran pemerintah 'Beleidsregel' adalah salah satu intrumen pemerintah yang terletak diruang kekuasaan bebas untuk mengakomodasi kepentingan rakyat yang membutuhkan peran Pemerintah dalam rangka "sturen". Tinjauan terhadap karakter 'beleidsregel' harus diletakkan dalam optik 'doelmatigheid'-- tidak sekedar 'wetmatigheid'."