Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Constitutionally the institution which has an authority to settle dispute between institutions is constitutional court. However, in the dispute between Judicial Comission and Supreme Court, the constitutionional court is not able to handle the case besause there is an exception of article 65 constitutional court."

"Sengketa kewenangan antar lembaga negara adalah perbedaan pendapat antar lembaga negara dan adanya tuntutan dari suatu lembaga negara terhadap lembaga negara yang lain. Dalam hal ini, sengketa kewenangan antar lembaga negara yang menjadi obyek sengketa merupakan kewenangan konstitusional. Hukum Islam dalam hidup bernegara memegang prinsip bahwa negara dibangun untuk menegakkan keadilan sebagaimana tertuang dalam Q.S. Al-Hujurat (49) ayat 10. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan antar lembaga negara terhadap negara yang menerapkan hukum Islam yaitu Afghanistan, Iran, dan Pakistan dan disandingkan dengan Indonesia yang dalam hal ini merupakan negara demokrasi dan mengakui hukum Islam sebagai salah satu sistem hukum yang hidup di masyarakat. Negara-negara tersebut merupakan negara yang melaksanakan syariat Islam dan sangat beragam. Skripsi ini hadir dengan membahas peranan lembaga yudisial dalam penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan antar lembaga negara dan penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan antar lembaga sebagaimana diatur dalam konstitusi di negara Islam. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode normatif dalam bentuk kualitatif, yang kemudian menyimpulkan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan antar lembaga negara di negara yang menerapkan hukum Islam memiliki cara penyelesaian dengan metode serta penerapannya yang berbeda.

---

Disputes over authority between state institutions are differences of opinion between state institutions and the existence of demands from one state institution against another state institution. In this case, the authority dispute between state institutions which is the object of the dispute is a constitutional authority. Islamic law provides guidance that the state is built to uphold justice as stated in Q.S. Al-Hujurat (49) verse 10. The problem in this study is how to resolve disputes over authority between state institutions against countries that adhere to Islamic law, namely Afghanistan, Indonesia, Iran and Pakistan and juxtaposed with Indonesia which in this case is a democratic country and recognizes Islamic law as one of the living legal systems in society. These countries are Muslim countries that implement Islamic law and have their own diversity. This thesis presents by discussing the role of the judiciary in resolving authority disputes between state institutions in countries that adhere to Islamic law and resolving authority disputes between institutions as stipulated in the constitution. This paper uses a normative method in a qualitative form, which then concludes that the settlement of disputes between the authorities of state institutions in countries that adhere to Islamic law has a way of solving them with their respective methods and applications."

"ABSTRAKMahkamah Konstitusi mempunyai fungsi untuk mengawal konstitusi agar dilaksanakan dan dihormati baik penyelenggara kekuasaan negara maupun warga negara. Tak ayal, reformasi hukum di Indonesia menjadi prasyarat untuk menjadi negara hukum yang demokratis. Salah satu bentuk reformasi hukum dalam institusi kekuasan kehakiman adalah gagasan mengadopsi mekanisme constitusional question kedalam sistem peradilan konstitusi. Constitutional question merujuk pada suatu mekanisme pengujian konstitusionalitas undang- undang, yaitu dalam hal seorang hakim yang sedang mengadili suatu perkara ragu-ragu mengenai konstitusionalitas undang-undang yang berlaku untuk perkara tersebut. Oleh karena itu, skripsi ini ingin membahas mengenai urgensi penerapan kewenangan constitutional question di Indonesia dan alternatif penerapan constitutional question di Indonesia. Metode penulisan yang digunakan adalah penulisan yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan menggunakan bahan kepustakaan serta wawancara. Dari hasil riset didapati bahwa terdapat urgensi untuk menambahkan kewenangan constitutional question di Indonesia. Diadopsinya mekanisme constitutional question adalah bentuk pemberian perlindungan maksimum terhadap hak konstitusional warga negara. Dengan adanya mekanisme tersebut, dapat dihindari adanya putusan hakim yang bertentangan dengan konstitusi dan melanggar hak konstitusional warga negara; ruang pengujian terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan semakin luas; dan dapat dihindari adanya pelanggaran hak konstitusional yang tidak diperlukan. Bila diterapkan di Indonesia, dasar kewenangan constitutional question dapat diatur melalui amandemen konstitusi, revisi Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, ataupun perluasan legal standing lembaga negara sebagai salah satu pemohon constitutional review. Dalam pelaksanaannya, pemohon constitutional question, baik hanya hakim peradilan umum maupun dibuka peluang bagi pihak yang berperkara, mengajukan permohonannya melalui kepaniteraan pengadilan tersebut untuk selanjutnya diolah oleh Ketua Pengadilan dan diajukan ke Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam bentuk serupa dengan constitutional review. Selain itu, perlu diatur mengenai kualifikasi pemohon constitutional question dan pembatasan waktu penanganan perkara constitutional question oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.

---

ABSTRACTThe Constitutional Court functions to oversee the implementation of the constitution both by state and citizen. Needless to say, legal reform in Indonesia is a requirement to be a democratic legal state. One part of legal reform in the institution of judicial power is the idea of adopting a constitutional questioning mechanism into the constitutional court system. Constitutional question refers to a mechanism for examining the constitutionality of a law, namely in the case of a judge who is adjudicating a case has a doubt regarding the constitutionality of the law applicable in the case. Therefore, this thesis would like to examine about the urgency of applying constitutional question and alternative way to implement constitutional question in Indonesia. Research method used is normative juridical writing with qualitative approach from library materials and interview. The research results found the urgency for the implementation of constitutional question in Indonesia. The adoption of the constitutional question mechanism is a form of maximum protection to the citizen rsquo s constitutional rights. With the existence of such mechanism, court decisions that are contrary to the constitution and violate the constitutional rights of the citizens can be avoided the testing material of the legislation becomes expansive and unnecessary constitutional rights violations can be avoided. If applied in Indonesia, the basis of the authority of constitutional question may be regulated through constitutional amendment, the revision of the Constitutional Court Law, the Constitutional Court Decision, or the extension of legal standing of state institutions as one of the applicants for constitutional review. In implementation, the applicant of constituional question, whether only judges from general courts or the opportunty will also be opened for litigant, files the application through the secretariat of the court. Henceforth the application will be processed by chairman of court and submitted to Constitutional Court in form similar to constitutional review. In addition, it is necessary to regulate the applicant 39 s qualification of constitutional question and time limitation for handling of constitutional question by the Constitutional Court. "

"[ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas dua permasalahan: alasan mengapa Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia perlu memiliki kewenangan untuk mengadili perkara pengaduan konstitusional; dan bagaimana seharusnya mengatur penambahan kewenangan tersebut. Hasil penelitian ini adalah: Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia perlu mendapatkan kewenangan ini demi menjalankan prinsip negara hukum yang dianut Republik Indonesia, melindungi Hak Asasi Manusia, menegakkan supremasi konstitusi, menjalankan checks and balances, memenuhi esensi pendirian mahkamah konstitusi di dunia, menjalankan fungsi pengujian konstitusional secara utuh, dan secara empiris banyak kasus yang bersubstansi pengaduan konstitusional sudah diajukan ke Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia; dan penambahan kewenangan tersebut hanya bisa dilakukan dengan amandemen undang-undang dasar.

---

ABSTRACT

, This thesis mainly discusses two problems: the urgency of giving the

jurisdiction for constitutional court of Republic of Indonesia over constitutional

complaint; and how the jurisdiction is supposedly given. This thesis concludes

that: constitutional court should have jurisdiction over constitutional complaint in

order to implement the principles of ‘rule of law’, protect human rights, uphold

the supremacy of constitution, maintain checks and balances function, fulfill the

essence of establishing constitutional court, and completely implement the

function of constitutional review, and empirically there has been many cases in

constitutional court of Republic of Indonesia that contain constitutional complaint

substance; and the only way to give the jurisdiction to constitutional court of

Republic of Indonesia is to amend the constitution.]"