Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The law regulating land matters in Indonesia up to present is the Agrarian Primary Law (Law No. 5 Year 1960), along with other implementing regulation indicate clearly that the government, in order to ensure the law certainty in Indonesia, has already provided a mechanism for land registration for the Indonesian public, on which in return for the registered land, the government will grant the land certificate as a strong proof of ownership. However, outside the juridical context mentioned, there are still several other documents dispersed within the Indonesian public, which are still considered as a valid proof of ownership, namely the so-called Girik/Kekitir and Indonesian Verponding certificate. This misperception caused by the taxing system before the current system applied, in which the tax is imposed only based on the land status and merely intended to the owner of the land possession right, which leads to a confusion with the basic idea that the Petuk Pajak or Girik (the tax payment bill) is the proof of the land ownership, while actually it is not. Supposedly, this misperception has already been vanished after the implementation of the new law, recalling that the new law eliminates the previous land status and tax, to be converted to other form. Eversince 1961, the land taxing mechanism was regulated within the so called IPEDA, which later will be replaced under the name of PBB (Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan / Land and Structure Tax). In order to reveal the reality of the Girik existence, as wellas the variants of the misperception and the causing factors, the writer conducts a field research in Kelurahan Kebon Jeruk, Kecamatan Kebon Jeruk, West Jakarta, with consideration that this area situated near the centre of governance, so that assumedly the implementation of land certificate as the proof of land ownership has already vested in the people's conscience. Ironically, the reality shows that most of them are still unaware of this mechanism, let along to realize the importance of certificate as the valid proof of land ownership. The research method applied within this research is the normative empirical one, that is, a study utilizing library data (secondary) and field research (primary) as the resource of data collecting. The conclusion to be drawn is that there do remains some part of the society who still consider Girik as the proof of land ownership, the primary causing factor of which is the expensive cost in processing the official certificate. "

"Didalam menggunakan dan memanfaatkan tanah, pemegang hak atas tanah wajib untuk menyesuaikan penggunaan dan pemanfaatannya dengan rencana tata ruang wilayah. Agar tanah dapat dipergunakan secara optimal maka dibuatlah rencana mengenai penggunaan tanah atau biasa disebut sebagai Rencana Tata Guna Tanah. Rencana Tata Ruang wilayah yang telah ditetapkan, sekali dalam waktu lima tahun dapat ditinjau ulang, dan jika peninjauan tersebut menghasilkan rekomendasi bahwa tata ruang yang ada perlu direvisi, maka disini terjadi perubahan tata ruang, misalnya tanah yang tadinya dapat dipergunakan sebagai perumahan harus berubah menjadi sodetan sungai seperti dalam kasus PT Masa Kreasi. Dalam kasus ini, perubahan rencana kota secara Normatif atas tanah Milik PT Kreasi tersebut diatur dengan Surat Keputusan Gubernur Kepala Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Nomor 592 tahun 1979 tentang Penguasaan Peruntukan dan Pembebasan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Cengkareng Drain, Sodetan-Sodetan Kali Sekretaris Bagian Atas dan Bagian Bawah, Wilayah Jakarta Barat. Perubahan rencana kota tersebut tentu saja berdampak bagi PT Masa kreasi maupun bagi tanah yang bersangkutan. Dalam hal ini dampak yang terjadi yaitu dengan berubahnya hubungan hukum PT Masa Kreasi dengan tanah yang dimilikinya tesebut.

---

In the use and utilization of land space, land rights holder is obligated to conform with the use and utilization of regional spatial layout plan.So that land can be utilized optimally then be made to the plan regarding land use, or commonly known as the Land Use Plan. Regional Spatial Layout Plan has been set, once in every five years can be reviewed, and if the review results in recommendation that the existing spatial layout should be revised, then the spatial layout changes here, for example, land formerly used as housing can be turned into a spatula rivers as in the case of PT Masa Kreasi.

In this case, changes in the normative urban plan for the land owned by PT Masa Kreasi is governed by the Decree of the Governor Jakarta Capital Special Region No. 592 of 1979 regarding Allotment of Tenure and Land Acquisition Development Cengkareng to Drain, Spatula -Spatula of River Sekertaris Top and Bottom SectionsWest Jakarta Area. Changes in the city plan, of course, affect PT Masa Kreasi as well as for the concerned landIn this case the impact occurred was by changing the legal relationship of PT Masa Kreasi with this land in interest."

"Keterbatasan lahan menyebabkan dilakukannya reklamasi Pantai Utara Jakarta yang dilakukan oleh PT. Pembangunan Jaya Ancol. Dasar hukum untuk melaksanakan reklamasi yaitu Keputusan Presiden Nomor 52 tahun 1995 tentang Reklamasi Pantai Utara Jakarta dan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 8 tahun 1995 tentang Penyelenggaraan Reklamasi dan Rencana Tata Ruang Kawasan Pantai Utara (Pantura) Jakarta. Atas tanah hasil reklamasi terdapat persoalan yaitu bagaimana pengaturan pemberian hak atas tanah hasil reklamasi Pantai Utara (Pantura) Jakarta yang dilakukan oleh PT. Pembangunan Jaya Ancol kepada pihak ketiga? Bagaimana pendaftaran hak atas tanah hasil reklamasi Pantai Utara (Pantura) Jakarta yang dilakukan oleh PT. Pembangunan Jaya Ancol berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah?. Penulis meneliti masalah tersebut dengan menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan data yang diperoleh dari lapangan sebagai pelengkap. Data penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Negara Agraria/ Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 3 Tahun 1999 tentang Pelimpahan Kewenangan Pemberian dan Pembatalan Keputusan Pemberian hak atas tanah negara dan Peraturan Menteri Negara Agraria/ Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 9 Tahun 1999 tentang Tata Cara Pemberian dan Pembatalan Hak Atas Tanah Negara dan Hak Pengelolaan. Pihak ketiga dapat memperoleh hak atas tanah hasil reklamasi dari Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) dengan meminta Surat Penunjukan Pelaksanaan (SPP) dan persetujuan tertulis ataupun rekomendasi dari PT. Pembangunan Jaya Ancol terlebih dahulu. Hak atas Tanah yang telah diberikan harus didaftarkan pada Kantor Pertanahan Kotamadya Jakarta Utara selambat-lambatnya dalam waktu 3 (tiga) bulan terhitung sejak tanggal Keputusan Pemberian Hak dibuat, dengan melampirkan Bukti Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah dan Bangunan (BPHTB) yang dikeluarkan oleh Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan yang wilayahnya meliputi letak tanah yang dimohon.

---

The reclamation of The North Coast Jakarta by PT Pembangunan Jaya Ancol is caused by the limitation of land. The base of the law to do this reclamation is the Presidential Decision Number 52 Year 1995 about reclamation of The North Coast Jakarta dan Regional Regulation Number 8 Year 1995 about Coordination of Reclamation and the plan of layout region. The North Coast (PANTURA) Jakarta. However, there is a cause for a new problem, which is how to set or limit the third party rights for the reclaimed land? How to register the land title of The North Coast Jakarta that is reclaimed by PT Pembangunan Jaya Ancol based on the government law Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 on Registration of Land?

The writer studied this problem with normative research method with the data gained from the field reports as the support. The research data show that under the law of Agrarian State Minister Regulation/Head of National land agency Number 3 Year 1999 on Delegation Authority of distribution and cancellation of Decision in giving land title of state land and Agrarian State Minister Regulation/Head of National land agency Number 9 Year 1999 on Ways of distribution and cancellation State Land and Land Under Right of Management.

The third party can get their land rights from reclaimation from National land agency (BPN) by requesting a letter ?SPP? and a written approval or recommendation from PT Pembangunan Jaya Ancol in advance. Land Title which was given have to register in Municipal Land Office North Jakarta at least in 3 months since the date decision of granting land was made, by attaching the receipt of Acquisition Duty of Right of Land and Building (BPHTB) which was issued by Land and Building Tax Office where the land is located."

"AbstrakSaat ini Indonesia dihadapkan pada permasalahan dimana lalu lintas data, termasuk OTT di dalamnya, mendominasi layanan telekomunikasi yang menyebabkan pendapatan interkoneksi semakin menurun. Padahal, biaya pemeliharaan jaringan cenderung naik. Kemunculan teknologi IP dapat memberikan keuntungan, baik terhadap Operator dalam scissor effect maupun menaikkan tingkat loyalitas pelanggannya. Namun, saat ini regulasi Interkoneksi di Indonesia masih menggunakan Time Division Multiplexing (TDM). Oleh karena itu, diperlukan suatu rekomendasi mengenai standarisasi pengkodean dan model interkoneksi IP. Dalam penelitian ini, aspek teknis dari model interkoneksi IP dianalisis dengan menggunakan perbandingan model, yaitu Peering dan Hubbing dengan metode no-transcoding pada 6 jenis codec(G.711a, G.711u, GSM, G.723, G.729, dan G.722) dengan pemberian berbagai beban trafik, (0 Mbps, 15 Mbps, 40 Mbps, dan 72 Mbps). Hasil performansi QoS berupa delay, Mean Opinion Score, packet loss, dan throughput yang diperoleh dari hasil simulasi masing-masing model dan kombinasi codec dianalisis dengan menggunakan server VOIP Asterisk 11 dan Microsip 3.17.3 untuk SIP phone juga Wireshark 2.2.4 dianalisis untuk mengetahui performansinya. Nilai one way delay QoS mengacu pada standar nilai pada ITU-T G.1010. Dari hasil simulasi diperoleh bahwa secara keseluruhan dengan beban trafik sampai 72 Mbps, model Peering merupakan alternatif model interkoneksi IP yang terbaik. Selain itu, penggunaan codec G729 menghasilkan performansi paling baik dengan nilai delay paling minimum dan MOS paling besar, sehingga paling direkomendasikan untuk digunakan dalam implementasi interkoneksi IP."

"AbstrakPrevious studies have shown that business performance is mostly determined by the ability of a company to create competitive advantage. However, the rapid changes in technology, markets, regulations and hypercompetition have made the business environment increasingly uncertain and unpredictable so that it can erode competitive advantage. This phenomenon is known as the turbulence of business environment and can cause a company to have difficulty maintaining its competitive advantage so that it is very interesting to study further. The purpose of this study is to understand how the turbulence of business environment occurs in the telecommunications industry in Indonesia. The study involved 213 leaders of business units of telecommunications operators in Indonesia as research respondents. The research methods used are descriptive survey and explanatory survey using component-based structural modeling, Partial Least Square-Path Modeling (PLS-PM). The results of the study showed that the telecommunications industry in Indonesia has experienced high turbulence of business environment, caused mainly by competitive turbulence. However, it was found that the technological turbulence and the market turbulence have contributed the most dominant to the occurrence of turbulence business environment in telecommunication industry. This study also discussed the problem solving of the business environment turbulence and recommendations for the sustainability of the telecommunications industry in Indonesia."

"Skripsi ini membahas regulasi Holding Company di Indonesia. Sebagaimana yang kita ketahui, konsep dari Holding Company adalah konsep yang umum di berbagai Negara tetapi hal tersebut berbeda di Indonesia, bahwa konsep ini tidaklah umum. Pada kenyataanya, Indonesia mempunyai peraturan perundangundangan yang mengatur tentang Holding Company. berdasarkan permasalahan tersebut, penulis mencoba untuk mengajukan pokok permasalahan, yang dimana adalah sebagai berikut :1. Bagaimanakah pengaturan Holding Company yang tersebar di dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia? 2. Bagaimanakah urgensi dari harmonisasi dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia? Dibagian terakhir dari skripsi ini, penulis mendapatkan kesimpulan bahwa pengaturan Holding Company di Indonesia tidak konsisten.

---

This thesis is discusses about the regulations of Holding Company in Indonesia. As we know it, the concept of Holding Company is common concept in many country but in Indonesia, this concept is not common. In fact, Indonesia has a regulations that regulated the Holding Company. Based on that problems, the writer tried to submit the reseacrh questions, which are : 1. How is the regulation of Holding Company that distributed in legislation that applies in Indonesia? 2. How is the urgency of harmonisation regulation of holding company in Indonesia?. In a last part this thesis, the writer get the conclusion that the regulation of holding company is not consistent."