Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Some countries still depend on tax revenue for development. In developing countries, tax revenue is still favorite than revenue from other sectors, including in Indonesia. One of the most important variants of tax revenue is corporate income tax. In the end of year 2007, Government issued Regulation of Government of Number 81 in The Year 2007 by giving reduced rate of 5% income tax from the corporate highest rate in calculation of income tax to be used only for Go Public Corporate Taxpayer who fulfsills some criteria which written in Regulation of Government of Number 81 in The Year 2007. The approach used in this research is descriptive quantitiative approach. The goal is trying to explain about justification of Regulation of Government of Number 81 in The Year 2007. Besides that, according to Regulation of Government of Number 81 in The Year 2007, researcher is trying to explain policy implementation of income tax reduce rate based on equity principle. The data collection technic used in this research is by read the literature which focus on the research, observation, and interview. The interview was done with tax government institution, an academic, taxpayer, and taxexpert. This research results that the reduced corporate income tax rate is not correct to be implemented in Indonesia. It can be seen from the conditions of the taxpayer who will not get the facility if they are not Go Public Regulation who fulfills the criteria which written in Regulation of Government of Number 81 in The Year 2007 and the implementation of reduced income tax rate which is not fair based on equity principle. This Regulation of government could not be implemented yet because until May 2008 there was no exercise regulation such as Finance Minister Regulation. Moreover, this research is also expected to give suggestions for government to rearrange Regulation of Government of Number 81 in The Year 2007, mainly policy for Taxpayer who will get the facility of reducing rate and to complete the exercise regulation by issuing Finance Minister Regulation and other exercise. Based on equity principle, in the equal condition taxpayer would be taxed by using the equal tax rate (according to horizontal equity). Taxpayer who get unequal of economic ability would be taxed by using unequal tax rate."

"Skripsi ini membahas implikasi pengenaan kebijakan diferensiasi tarif pajak penghasilan bagi karyawan yang tidak mempunyai NPWP. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini memperlihatkan pemerintah dalam mengeluarkan kebijakan diferensiasi tarif pajak penghasilan tidak didasari teori yang kuat. Hukum materiil dengan hukum formal bercampur karena unsur sanksi yang seharusnya terdapat dalam Undang-undang KUP, terdapat dalam tarif Undang-undang Pajak Penghasilan. Pemberlakuan diferensiasi tarif pajak penghasilan bertentangan dengan prinsip ability to pay. Bagi karyawan yang mempunyai penghasilan yang sama besarnya mendapat perlakuan yang berbeda. Hal ini menimbulkan ketidak adilan horizontal. Hendaknya dalam menaikkan penerimaan negara pemerintah hendaknya mengeluarkan kebijakan dengan tidak mengorbankan keadilan bagi masyarakat.

---

The focus of this study is implication of outcome differential tariff income tax policy for employee who don't have Tax Payer Number. This research is qualitative research with descriptive design. The result of this research showed that the goverment policy on Differential tariff income tax didn't have strong theory based. Material law with formal law is mixed because there is penalty element that should have been included in general rule tax law in fact included in income tax law.

The aplication of differential tariff is against with the ability to pay principle. For employee who has same income get different treatment. This situation makes horizontal disequity. In raising country income government should made new policy which don't sacrifice people's equity."

"Hadirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2008 merupakan perubahan baru bagi Wajib Pajak khususnya Wajib Pajak badan. Salah satu perubahan yang terdapat dalam undang-undang tersebut adalah pemberian fasilitas pengurangan tarif Pajak Penghasilan (PPh) bagi Wajib Pajak badan Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah (UMKM). Pengurangan tarif tersebut dikarenakan adanya perubahan tarif pada Pasal 17 yaitu tarif umum PPh bagi Wajib Pajak badan. Kebijakan tersebut sangat menarik, karena fasilitas yang diberikan kepada Wajib Pajak berdasarkan peredaran bruto. Peredaran bruto yang dimiliki oleh sebuah UMKM dapat mempengaruhi pajak yang terhutang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebijakan pengurangan tarif PPh badan melalui Pasal 31E Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2008 ditinjau dari sisi keadilan pemungutan pajak. Konsep utama yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah konsep fasilitas atau insentif pajak dan konsep keadilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu melalui pendekatan kuantitatif dengan analisis data kualitatif. Data kualitatif diperoleh melalui studi literatur dan wawancara mendalam. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan maka dihasilkan kesimpulan bahwa kebijakan yang dikeluarkan oleh pemerintah melalui Pasal 31E Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2008, tidak mencerminkan keadilan baik dari segi keadilan horizontal maupun keadilan vertikal. Dalam mencapai suatu keadilan sebaiknya perumus kebijakan memberikan batasan fasilitas tersebut berdasarkan Penghasilan Kena Pajak dan bukan peredaran bruto.

---

The presence of Tax Laws No. 36/2008 is a new change for taxpayers, especially company taxpayers. One of the changes in the law is the reduction policy of taxon-revenue of micro-small-intermediate company taxpayer. The reduction is given due to the change of rate in the Article 17, which is general tax-on-revenue rate of company taxpayers. The policy is so interesting because the facility given to taxpayer is based on bruto circulation. Bruto circulation of a micro-smallintermediate company can influence the tax liability. This research aims to analyze the reduction policy of tax-on-revenue of micro-small-intermediate company taxpayer through Article 31E of Tax Laws No.36/2008 observed from equity principle in taxation. The main concepts used in this research are concept of facility or tax incentive and concept of equity principles. Research method used in quantitive approach with qualitative data analysis. Qualitative data is obtained from literature study and in-depth interview. The result is that the policy issued by the government through Article 31E in Tax Laws No.36/2008 does not reflect equity, both from horizontal and vertical equity principle. In achieving equity, the policy maker should give limitations of the facility, based on taxable revenue instead of bruto circulation."

"Terbitnya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 tahun 2013 dan tetap terbitnya peraturan lama yaitu angsuran Pajak Pengahsilan Pasal 25, memunculkan kebingungan bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi terutama Pedagang Pengecer, dalam menggunakan peraturan dalam tahun 2013. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui latar belakang penerbitan Pemerintah Nomor 46 tahun 2013 dan perbandingan kedua peraturan ditinjau dari prinsip Ease of Administration. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan teknik analisis wawancara mendalam dan studi literatur. Hasil penelitian adalah kemudahan adalah kata kunci dari latar belakang dikeluarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 tahun 2013 dan prinsip Ease of Administration sebagian besar dipenuhi oleh PER 32/PJ/2010 dibandingkan dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 tahun 2013. Upaya untuk memenuhi prinsip Ease of Administration, pemerintah membenahi kembali Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 tahun 2013.

---

Issuance of Government Regulation No. 46 of 2013 and the old rules are still the issuance of income tax installment Article 25, led to confusion for the individual taxpayer primarily Merchant Retailers, in using the rules in 2013. This study was conducted to determine the background of the issuance of Government Regulation No. 46 of 2013 and a comparison of the two rules in terms of the principle of Ease of Administration. This study used a qualitative approach with in-depth technical analysis of interviews and literature studies.

The results of the study were convenience are the key words of background issued Government Regulation No. 46 of 2013 and the principle of Ease of Administration largely met by PER 32/PJ/2010 compared to Government Regulation No. 46 of 2013. Efforts to meet the principle of Ease of Administration, the government fix the back of Government Regulation No. 46 of 2013."

"Peranan masyarakat dalam pembiayaan pembangunan harus terus ditumbuhkan. Untuk meningkatan penerimaan pajak pada tahun 1983 telah dilakukan pembebanan perpajakan dengan mengubah sistem pemungutan pajak dari official assessment menjadi self assessment. Dalam penelitian ini pokok permasalahannya yaitu bagaimana sistem self assessment dapat meningkatkan penerimnaan pajak secara substansial.Si stem self assessment memberikan kepercayaan kepada Wajib Pajak untuk menghitung, menyetor, dan melapor sendiri jumlah pajak yang seharusnya terutang sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan perpajakan. Fiskus sesuai dengan fungsinya berkewajiban melakukan pembinaan, penelitian dan pengawasan terhadap Wajib pajak dengan baik.Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan tesis ini adalah metode deskriptif analisis, dengan teknik pengumpulan data berupa penelitian kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan pada KPP yaitu Seksi TOP, Seksi PPh Badan, Seksi Penerimaan dan Keberatan, dan Bagian Umum, melalui wawancara dan pengamatan langsung.Penelitian dilaksanakan pada KPP "X" dengan temuan-temuan wajib pajak yang menjadi kewenangan KPP "X", wajib pajak yang memasukkan SPT, jumlah wajib pajak yang di periksa, kreteria wajib pajak yang di periksa, jumlah pemeriksa, hasil pemeriksaan dan penerimaanPembahasan dalam penelitian inibahwa jumlah pemeriksa SPT Wajib Pajak sangat kecil dari SPT Wajib Pajak yang haru di periksa, selisihnya tidak diadakan pemeriksaan bukan karena telah melaksanakan ketentuan perpajakan, tetapi karena tidak tertangani oleh petugas yang jumlah personilnya terbatas. Kreteria Wajib pajak yang di periksa Wajib Pajak yang lebih bayar yang menjadi sasaran utama, sebaiknya pemeriksaan dialihkan ke Wajib Pajak rugi dan Wajib Pajak kreteria khusus.Daripembahasan dapat disimpulkan bahwa jumlah Wajib Pajak yang di periksa masih sangat minim, jumlah petugas sangat minim di banding jumlah SPT Wajib Pajak yang hares di periksa, Pemeriksaan sasaran utamanya adalah Wajib Pajak lebih bayar, Prosentase pemeriksa di banding jumlah Wajib Pajak yang perlu di periksa sangat kecil, penerimaan pajak dapat ditingkatkan bila dilakukan pemeriksaan, sedang saran adalah supaya diupayakan jumlah Wajib Pajak yang di periksa lebih banyak, melakukan penambahan jumlah pemeriksa pemeriksa, yang diutamakan yang di periksa adalab Wajib Pajak rugi dan Wajib Pajak criteria khusus.

---

The Execution Of Self Assessment System In Relation With Income Tax Collection Of The Body Of Tax Obligation (Study Case At X Tax Services Office)The role of people in development leasing should be keep grown with pushing awareness, understanding and comprehension that the development is right, duty and responsible of the whole of people. The execution of national development should be based on self-ability, mainly if the citizen realizes the participation to pay tax To increase tax collection in year 1983 has been conducted tax reformation with changing tax collection system from official assessment becoming self assessment In this research, the main problem is how self-assessment system can increase tax collection substantially.Self assessment system gives the confidence to Tax Obligation to account deposit and report himself/herself concerning the amount of tax should become debt in accordance with tax regulations. The government in this matters tax officer in accordance with his/her role should conduct construction, research and inspection to tax obligation properly.Research Method used in this thesis is analysis description method, with- data collection technique in from of library and field research to relevant parties in this thesis (fish's) through deep interview.This research is conducted at KPP X" with the finding of tax obligation becoming the authorization of KPP "X", tax obligation fills SPT, number of tax obligation inspector, the result of inspection and collection.The discussion in this research that the number of inspector of SPT tax obligation is very small that SPT tax obligation should be inspected, the different was not conducted inspection not because it has conducted the tax stipulation, but because not handled by the limited number of officer. The criteria of tax obligation inspected more payable obligation tax becoming main target, for more payable tax obligation if it has been inspected for two years respectively, it should be better if changed position to loss tax obligation and tax obligation with specific criteriaFrom the discussion can be concluded that the number of tax obligation inspected was very minim, the number of officers were very minim if it was compared to the number of SPT tax obligation should be inspected was very small, tax income can be increased if it was conducted inspection, while the suggestion is in order to be efford more number of tax obligation inspection, conduct the addition of inspectors number, the main inspected is loss tax obligation and tax obligation with specific criteria."

"Penurunan tarif Pajak Penghasilan badan bagi perseroan terbuka dan relaksasi persyaratannya dikeluarkan oleh pemerintah sebagai respon terhadap kondisi pasar modal di masa pandemi Covid-19. Penurunan Indeks Harga Saham Gabungan (IHSG) yang signifikan menjadi salah satu alasan pemerintah untuk mengeluarkan insentif pajak tersebut. Namun, pada tahun 2020 tercatat masih banyak perseroan terbuka yang belum memenuhi persyaratan untuk mendapatkan penurunan tarif Pajak Penghasilan badan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian kualitatif dengan teknik analisis data kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi lapangan dan studi literatur. Penghitungan cost and benefit analysis dalam penelitian ini didasarkan pada data yang diperoleh dari prospektus dan laporan keuangan dari beberapa perseroan terbuka yang memenuhi kriteria penghitungan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penetapan keempat persyaratan dan relaksasi pembelian kembali saham yang ditetapkan untuk mendapatkan penurunan tarif Pajak Penghasilan badan bagi perseroan terbuka memiliki latar belakang yang berbeda. Kemudian upaya untuk memenuhi persyaratan mendapatkan penurunan tarif Pajak Penghasilan badan dapat dibagi menjadi dua, yaitu Initial Public Offering (IPO) bagi perseroan tertutup dan Right Issue serta Private Placement bagi perseroan terbuka. Terakhir adalah net benefit yang dihasilkan dari cost and benefit analysis yang dilakukan menunjukan hasil yang sangat positif.

---

The corporate income tax rates reduction for listed companies and the relaxation of requirements was issued by the government in response to capital market conditions during the Covid-19 pandemic. The significant decline in the Indonesia Composite Index (ICI) was one of the reasons for the issuance of the tax incentives by the government. However, in 2020 there were still a lot of public companies that have not fulfill the requirements to get a corporate income tax rates reduction. This study uses a qualitative research approach with qualitative data analysis techniques. Data collection techniques that being used are field studies and literature studies. The cost and benefit calculation analysis in this study is based on data obtained from prospectuses and financial reports of several public companies that fulfill the calculation criteria. The results of this study indicate that the determination of the requirements and the relaxation of buyback are determined to obtain a reduction in the corporate income tax rate for listed companies respectively have a different backgrounds. Then, the efforts to fulfill the requirements to get an income tax rates reduction can be divided into two, that are Initial Public Offering (IPO) for private companies and Right Issues and Private Placements for listed companies. Finally, the net benefit resulting from the cost and benefit analysis carried out shows a very positive result.

"