Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 88656 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Fandi Musjafir
"Isu mengenai Good Corporare Governance (GCG) mulai ramai dibahas dan dirasakan sangat penting setelah negara-negara di Asia Timur mengalami krisis ekonomi yang dimulai pada pertengahan lahun 1997. Di Indonesia krisis tersebut mengakibatkan fluktuasi yang luar biasa pada nilai tukar rupiah terhadap mata uang asing. Kondisi tersebut berdampak terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi, Tahun 1998 pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia mencapai titik terendah sejak era Soeharto yakni minus 13 %.
Berdasarkan survey yang dilakukan oleh Asian Development Bank (ADB) 5 (lima) negara di kawasan Asia, ditemukan bebera faktor yang mpnyebabkan krisis ekonomi itu terjadi, yaitu : lemahnya enforcement hukum, lemahnya pasar modal, Kosentrasi tinggi dalam kepemilikan perusahaan pada sekelompok/pihak tertentu, dan lemahnya persaingan.
Pendapat lain menyatakan bahwa terjadinya krisis ekonomi juga disebabkan lemahnya penerapan Good Corporale Governance di dalam perusahaan yang meliputi keadilan, keterbukaan, akuntabilitas, dan tanggungjawab (Nasution, 2006). Oleh karena itu, Good Corporate Governanace menjadi salah satu bahasan penting dalam rangka mendukung pemulihan ekonomi dan pertumbuhan ekonomi yang stabil di masa yang akan datang.
Keberadaan teori agency (agency theory) sangat melatarbelakangi isu corporate governance dimana agency problem muncul ketika kepengurusan suatu perusahaan terpisah dari pemiliknya. Dengan adanya pemisahan tersebut seringkali terjadi konflik konflik kepentingan di dalam perusahaan antara kedua pihak tersebut. Dimana kemungkinan besar konflik tersebut dapat membawa bencana terhadap perusahaan (kebangkrutan). Konflik tersebut dapat diminimalkan dengan suatu mekanisme yang mampu mensejajarkan kepentingan pemegang saham selaku pemilik dengan kepentingan manajemen (dewan direksi dan komisaris). Mekanisme tersebut dikenal dengan istilah Good Corporate Governance atau tata kelola perusahaan yang baik dalam menjalankan bisnisnya.
Sampai saat ini banyak pendapat pro dan kontra mengenai hubungan mekanisme Good Corporare Governance (GCG) dengan kinerja keuangan perusahaan. Oleh karena itu belum ada bahasa yang universal mengenai ini. Perusahaan - perusahaan di Indonesia masih mencari bentuk yang pas untuk melaksanakan konsep GCG ini. Dengan demikian implementasi GCG di satu perusahaan mungkin akan berbeda dengan perusahaan lain tergantung karakteristik perusahaannya dan industrinya. Penelitian ini akan melihat mekanisme GCG pada perusahaan manufaktur yang mengalami kesulitan keuangan pada periode 2005 - 2006. Mekanisme GCG yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah ukuran dewan direksi, dewan komisaris, komitc audit, komisaris independen, dan persentase kepemilikan institusional.
Berdasarkan analisa yang dilakukan ditemukan hasil bahwa ukuran dewan direksi, dewan komisaris, komite audit, komisaris independen, dan persentase kepemilikan institusional tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap besamya kemungkinan perusahaan mengalami kesulitan keuangan. Dengan kata lain perusahaan yang mengalami kesulitan keuangan pada periode 2005 - 2006 lebih disebabkan oleh faktor lain diluar penelitian ini.

The issue about Good Corporate Governance was begin to talked and felt very important after many country in East Asia go down into economic crisis which was started in the middle year 1997. ln Indonesian, that crisis causes a dramatic fluctuation of Rupiah exchange rate to foreign exchange rate. That condition effect to economic growth. Economic growth of Indonesian gets to lowest rate since era Suharto which is minus 13% in the year 1998.
Based on survey which is done by Asian Development Bank (ADB), 5 (live) countries in regional Asia, was founded few factor that caused economic crisis happened, there are: poor law enforcement, poor capital market, high concentration ownership by individual or group, and poor competition.
Other opinion said that economic crisis was also caused by poor implementation Good Corporate Governance in the corporate which including fairness, openness, accountability, and responsibility. Because of that, Good Corporate Governance is one of important topic in order to support economic recovery and stability economic growth in the future.
Existence of agency theory give a background about Good Corporate Governance issue absolutely which agency problem emerges when management in a company is separated from its owner or shareholder. With that existence of dissociation always make a conflict of interest inside company between both parties. That conflict might be give a big problem for company (be bankcruptcy). That conflict can be decreased with a mechanism that can make two interest into the same level. That mechanism was known as good corporate governance in running business.
There is many pro and contra opinion about Good Corporate Governance mechanism with financial performance until this time. Companies in Indonesian still search fit shape to doing this GCG concept. Therefore this implementation in one company might be different in other company due the Company and industry characteristic. This study examined the difference of Corporate Governance mechanism in financially distressed firm and non financially distress limt. Corporate Governance mechanism eaxamined in this study are size of board, independency of board, audit committee, and institutional ownership.
The result of this study showed that board or director, board of commissioner, audit committee, board independency, and institutional ownership has no impact of experienced financial distressed firms. ln other word, there is other factor that caused financial distress firm in period 2005 - 2006."
Depok: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, 2008
T23908
UI - Tesis Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Ratna Wardhani
"ABSTRAK
This study examines the differencCorporate Governance mechanisms are believed to have strong impact on the companies' performance. The implementation of Corporate Governance in one company might be different to the implementation of Corporate Governance in other company due to the characteristics of the company. This study examines the difference of Corporate Governance mechanisms in financially distressed firms
and non financially distressedfirms. Corporate Governance mechanisms examined in this study are board size, independency of board, institutional ownership and director ownership. The result of this study shows that board size has a significant negative impact on the probability of firm experienced financial distressed after controlling for firms asset and leverage. This result is also confirmed by test using lag one year. This study fails to document the evidence of the relationship of board independency and ownership structure with the probability of firm experienced financial distressed."
[Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia;Fakultas Ekonomi UI, Fakultas Ekonomi UI], 2007
J-pdf
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Indra Rudianto
"ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance dan karakteristik perusahaan terhadap probabilita diakuisisi. Mekanisme corporate governance yang diuji yaitu keberadaan komisaris independen dan ukuran (size) dewan komisaris dari sisi internal governance, serta auditor eksternal dan monitoring bank dari sisi external governance. Sementara karakteristik perusahaan yang diuji adalah profitabilitas dan ukuran (size) perusahaan. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan menggunakan model regresi logistik dengan sampel 90 observasi dari perusahaan diakuisisi dan tidak diakuisisi selama periode 2004 ? 2011 dan tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia.
Hasil dari penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa monitoring bank yang diukur dari besarnya pinjaman bank yang diperoleh dari bank berkualitas monitoring baik, jumlah (size) dewan komisaris dan profitabilitas perusahaan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap menurunnya probabilita diakuisisi. Sedangkan komisaris independen,auditor eksternal dan ukuran perusahaan tidak berpengaruh terhadap probabilita diakuisisi.

ABSTRACT
The objective of this research is to examine the effect of corporate governance mechanism and firm characteristics on the probability of being acquired. Corporate governance mechanism that were examined are the role of independent commissioner and board size as internal governance mechanism, as well as external auditor and bank monitoring as external governance mechanism. Firm characteristic that were examined are profitability and firm? size. Hypotheses testing are conducted using logistic regression model with observations from 90 sample of acquired and non acquired publicly listed companies in Indonesia during the period 2004 - 2011.
The result of this study concluded that bank monitoring measured by the amount of bank loan from the bank with good monitoring quality, board size and firm profitability has significant effect on decreasing the probability being acquired. While independent commissioner, external auditor and firm? size has no significant impact on probability being acquired.
"
Depok: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, 2012
T32243
UI - Tesis Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Desti Maharani
"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance yang diproksi dengan persentase kepemilikan saham terbesar, ukuran dewan komisaris, dan efektivitas komite audit terhadap pemilihan auditor eksternal pada perusahaan non jasa keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan klasifikasi auditor Top 10 dan non Top 10 sebagai proksi dari kualitas audit yang akan dipilih perusahaan. Penelitian menggunakan 434 observasi selama periode 2009-2010. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya pengaruh positif signifikan antara persentase kepemilikan saham terbesar, ukuran dewan komisaris, dan efektivitas komite audit terhadap pemilihan auditor eksternal oleh perusahaan.

This study aimed to analyze the impact of corporate governance mechanism, proxied by largest shareholder, board size, and audit committee's effectiveness on external auditor choice in non financial service companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study used Top 10 and non Top 10 auditor classification as a proxy of audit quality that will be chosen by the company. This study used 434 observations over the period 2009-2010. The results showed that there are significant positive effects of largest shareholder, board size, and audit committee's effectiveness on external auditor choice by the company."
Depok: Universitas Indonesia, 2012
S-Pdf
UI - Skripsi Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Sihombing, Juwita
"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk meneliti bubungan variabel ukuran dewan
komisaris, ukuran dewan direksi, proporsi dewan komisaris independen,
kepemilikan institusi, kepemilikan kemungkinan perusahaan mengaiami financial distress. Pengujian dilakukan atas keluarga, dan komite audit dengan 172 tahun perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di IDX yang terdiri dari 86 tahun perusahaan yang mengalani financial distress dan 86 tahun perusahaan yang tidak mengalami firancial distress, dengan periode pengamatan tahun 2003 sampai tahun 2007. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah 2003 regresi logis. Hasil pengujian regresi logit menunjukkan bahwa variabel ukuran dewan komisaris berpengaruh negatif signifikan terbadap kemungkinan perusahaan mengalami financial distress dan variabel kontrol leverage berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap kemungkinan perusahaan mengalami financial distress. Untuk variabel ukuran dewan direksi, propors komisaris independcn, kepemilikan institusiooal, kepemilikan keluarga, komite audit dan variabel kontrol ukuran perusahaan tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kemungkinan perusahaan mengalami francial distress
The purpose of this research is to investigare the relationship be commissioner, institutional ownership, Samily ownership, and audit committee on the probability of companies experienced financial distress. This study use samples of 172 firm-years of listed manufactured companies which consist of 86 firm years of company in financial distress and 86 firm years of compannancial distress, during 2003-2007 periods. The analysis use logistic reg leverage as comtrol variable have a significant negative impact on the probability. Logistic regression results show that board of commissioner size and company experienced financial distress, but director board size, independent proportion, institurional ownership, family ownership, a committee, and size of company as controllable variable are failed to show their significan impact on the probability of company experienced financial distress."
Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, 2009
T-pdf
UI - Tesis Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Rosemarine Rahmawati Suriadinata
"[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh peringkat corporate governance terhadap kinerja keuangan periode 2008-2012. Pengujian ini dilakukan menggunakan metode regresi data panel, dimana variabel dependen adalah kinerja keuangan yang diproksikan oleh earning per share, Return on Assets, dan Return on Equity sedangkan peringkat corporate governance sebagai variabel independen. Terdapat tiga model dalam penelitian ini, yaitu menggunakan nilai dari masing-masing variabel dependen. Hasil penelitian pada model pertama menunjukkan bahwa peringkat corporate governance tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan. Model kedua dan ketiga memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan.

The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation
method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance, which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator, while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm
performance.;The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on
firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation
method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance,
which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator,
while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three
models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results
of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not
have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models
indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm
performance., The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on
firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation
method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance,
which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator,
while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three
models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results
of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not
have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models
indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm
performance.]
"
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia, 2015
S60728
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Banyu Kuncoro Jakti
"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance terhadap kinerja keuangan pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) selama periode 2009 hingga 2013. Variabel independen dalam penelitian ini adalah corporate governance. Variabel dependen yang digunakan adalah kinerja perusahaan. Corporate governance diukur dengan menggunakan ukuran dewan komisaris, proporsi dewan komisaris indpenden, dan ukuran komite audit. Untuk mengukur kinerja perusahaan, dalam penelitian ini menggunakan dua ukuran pengukuran; Return On Equity (ROE) dan Net Profit Margin (NPM). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan uji regresi data panel. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa ukuran dewan komisaris memiliki pengaruh yang tidak signifikan terhadap ROE sedangkan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap NPM, proporsi komisaris independen memiliki pengaruh yang tidak signifikan baik terhadap ROE maupun NPM, ukuran komite audit memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap ROE maupun NPM.

The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of corporate governance on the corporate performance of industrial firm listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2009-2013. Independent and dependent variables of this research is corporate governance and corporate performance. For measuring corporate governance, in this research used three measurement: size of board commissioners, proportion of independent board commissioners, and size of board committee. For measuring corporate performance used two measurement: Return On Equity (ROE) and Net Profit Margin (NPM). Hypotheses are tested using the estimation method of panel data. The results of this study find that size of board commissioners has insignificant on ROE and has significant on NPM, proportion of non executive board commissioners has insignificant on ROE and NPM, size of board committee has significant on ROE and NPM.
"
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Indonesia, 2015
S58526
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Sherly Marselistiana
"Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance terhadap cash holdings dan firm value. Penelitian ini menggunakan uji analisis Fixed Effect Model (FEM). Variabel independen pada penelitian ini adalah ukuran dewan direksi, komisaris independen, dan kepemilikan manajerial, sedangkan variabel dependennya adalah cash holdings yang diproksikan dengan logaritma natural dari total kas pada penutupan akhir tahun dan firm value yang diproksikan dengan perhitungan Tobin's Q. Penelitian ini menggunakan data panel sejumlah 1314 observasi dari sampel perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2007-2012.
Hasil peneltian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) ukuran dewan direksi memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap cash holdings, (2) komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap cash holdings, (3) ukuran dewan direksi tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap firm value, (4) komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap firm value.

The main objective of this research is to analyze the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on cash holdings and firm value. This research is analyze with Fixed Effect Model (FEM). The Independence variables in this research are the board size, board independence, and insider ownership, for the dependent variables are cash holdings that proxied by log of year end total cash and firm value that proxied by Tobin's Q. This study use a panel data sample of 1314 observations listed non financial firms in the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the periode 2007-2012.
The results showed that: (1) board size have significant effect on cash holdings, (2) board independence and insider ownership doesn't have significant effect on cash holdings, (3) board size doesn't have significant effect on firm value, (4) board independence and insider ownership have significant effect on firm value.
"
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia, 2014
S54517
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Arista Lya Kusuma
"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan bukti empiris mengenai pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance terhadap tingkat pengungkapan research and development. Mekanisme corporate governance dalam penelitian ini diproksikan oleh kepemilikan keluarga, kepemilikan asing, kepemilikan institusional, efektivitas dewan komisaris dan kualitas audit. Penelitian menggunakan sampel perusahaan technology-driven yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2009-2011.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepemilikan asing dan kepemilikan institusional berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap tingkat pengungkapan research and development sedangkan kualitas audit berhubungan positif. Sementara itu tidak ditemukan cukup bukti mengenai hubungan kepemilikan keluarga dan efektivias dewan komisaris terhadap tingkat pengungkapan sukarela.

This research is to provide empirical evidence of the influence of corporate governance mechanism on the research and development disclosure rate. Family ownership, foreign ownership, institutional ownership, the effectiveness of the board of commissioners as well as the audit quality are used to proxy the corporate governance mechanism. Samples used in the research are technology- driven companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange between 2009 and 2011.
The result shows that foreign ownership and institutional ownership have a negative and significant influence on the research and development disclosure rate while the audit quality has a positive relation. Meanwhile, there is no sufficient evidence showing the influence of family ownership and the effectiveness of the board of commissioners on the research and development disclosure rate.
"
Depok: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, 2013
S44422
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Dela Khurniasari
Depok: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, 2010
T33502
UI - Tesis Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
<<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   >>