Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 173568 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Indra Hidayanto, Author
"Upaya penagqulangan kejahatan merupakan masalah universal yang terus menerus harus selalu diupayakan. Oleh karena itu dibutuhkan keterpaduan antara komponen-komponen yang terlibat dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang diatur diatur dan di tata dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana atau KUHAP. KUHAP sejak kelahirannya sangat menjunjung tinggi hak-hak tersangka atau terdakwa tanpa bertujuan secara khusus melindungi hak korban kejahatan. Terjadi ketidak seimbangan dalam perlakuan yang wajar antara tersangka atau terdakwa dengan korban kejahatan di dalam KUHAP. Masyarakat, terutama korban kejahatan sangat mendambakan keadilan dengan dipidananya pelaku kejahatan, sangat membutuhkan akses dalam penyelenggaraan peradilan. Masyarakat berhak tahu sampai sejauh mana perkembangannya penanganan perkara yang ditangani oleh aparat penegak hukum. Menyikapi hal tersebut penulis tertarik untuk mengambil permasalahan pokok dalam penelitian ini yaitu: "Bagaimana penerapan pemberian informasi tentang kemajuan penanganan perkara kepada korban dalam Lahap pra-adyudikasi". KUHAP tidak mengatur ketentuan pemberian informasi penanganan perkara oleh aparat penegak hukum. Sejak tahun 1985 dunia internasional telah menyepakati Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power. Di Indonesia telah lahir pula Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Dalam dua ketentuan ini telah diatur bahwa saksi dan korban berhak mendapatkan informasi perkembangan kasus. Penulis melakukan penelitian normatif dan empiris yang disajikan secara kualitatif, ternyata penegak hukum belum melaksanakan secara optimal dalam pelaksaan teknisnya di lapangan. Padahal pemberian informasi mengenai penanganan perkara ini sangat penting dan urgen untuk segera dilaksanakan dalam rangka pengawasan kinerja aparat penegak hukum serta kesuksesan proses peradilan pidana, sehingga rasa keadilan masyarakat dapat tercapai. Oleh karena itu diharapkan dalam rancangan KUHAP yang akan datang hal pemberian informasi kemajuan penanganan perkara ini perlu diatur lebih tegas.

The effort for overcoming crimes is a universal problem to be done continuously. Hence, it requires integration among components involved in the criminal justice system as legislated by Law No. 8/1981 of the Penal Code. Since the enactment, the penal code protect the rights of suspected or the accused more than to protect the right of victim of crime specially. Within the Penal Code there is no balance of proper treatment between the suspected or accused and the victim of crime. Society especially the victim of crime, they are very wishing justice by sentencing the offender and they need to access to courts. Society have right to know how far the progress of the case handled by the police and the prosecutor. Hence, the author in interest to write the essential problem for this research, i,e,: "How application of giving information regarding progress of the case in pre-adjudication stage". The Penal Code had not provided with regulation of giving information to settle case by police and prosecutor in pre-adjudication stage. Since the enactment of 1985 the World had agreed Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power. Also in Indonesia had been enacted Law No. 13/2006 of Protection for Witness and Victim(s). For those two instruments it had been regulated that 'witness and victims have right to get information about progress of the case. The author had conducted both normative and empirical research presented qualitatively, factually, the legal apparatus had not implemented its techniques in field optimally. Indeed, giving information about progress of the case is very urgent and important to be implemented immediately within framework of supervising the legal apparatus and to proceed criminal justice system successfully, so that, sense of justice of society may be achieved. Hence, it is wished to design The Penal Code for the future, giving information about progress of the case should be regulated more firmly.
"
Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2007
T19441
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Rizqan Naelufar
"[ABSTRAK
Tesis ini merupakan kajian yang hendak melihat konsep lembaga yang
berwenang dalam sebuah proses peradilan. Relevansi antar lembaga sebagaimana
dimaksud yaitu Komisi Informasi dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara adalah
berwenang dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa keterbukaan informasi publik.
tujuan daripada keterbukaan informasi publik adalah dalam rangka mengawal
kebebasan informasi sebagai falsafah Hak Asasi Manusia dalam generasi ketiga.
Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teori Hukum, teori Politik Hukum Nasional,
Teori Pembagian Kekuasaan dan Kekuasaan Keempat, kerangka konsep yang
digunakan yaitu peradilan administrasi dalam perspektif politik hukum dan
Kebebasan atas informasi sebagai HAM.
Hasil dari penelitian menunjukan bahwa komisi informasi ditempatkan
layaknya peradilan tingkat pertama karena hasil dari putusan dapat dimintakan
banding kepada PTUN, dalam proses di PTUN menggunakan hukum acara
tersendiri yang menempatkan PTUN sebagai peradilan Banding. atas hasil
penelitian maka terdapat suatu paradigma baru dalam sistem peradilan di
Indonesia. Gagasan yang diambil dari penelitian adalah dengan
mengkonsolidasikan sistem penyelesaian sengketa informasi publik dalam
peradilan khusus dibawah PTUN, Konsep demikian digunakan agar dapat
mengawal dan memperkuat sistem hukum dan peradilan di Indonesia.

ABSTRACT
This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions
the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission
of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute
public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to
guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third
generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,
Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the
conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective
and freedom of information as a human rights.
Results of the research showed that the commission of information like
first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the
Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural
law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the
research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea
from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in
a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order
to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia.;This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions
the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission
of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute
public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to
guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third
generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,
Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the
conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective
and freedom of information as a human rights.
Results of the research showed that the commission of information like
first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the
Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural
law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the
research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea
from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in
a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order
to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia.;This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions
the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission
of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute
public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to
guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third
generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,
Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the
conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective
and freedom of information as a human rights.
Results of the research showed that the commission of information like
first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the
Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural
law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the
research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea
from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in
a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order
to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia., This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions
the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission
of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute
public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to
guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third
generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,
Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the
conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective
and freedom of information as a human rights.
Results of the research showed that the commission of information like
first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the
Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural
law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the
research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea
from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in
a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order
to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia.]"
2015
T43067
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Usman
"Penelitian ini bertujuan, pertama untuk mengetahui tingkat keberhasilan implementasi kebijakan penunjukan pihak ketiga dalam melaksanakan sebagian proses peneraan dan peneraan ulang meter kWh hubungannya dengan faktor-faktor kristis yang mempengaruhinya, dan kedua untuk mengetahui kesesuaian kebijakan tersebut dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang lainnya. Menurut Edwards III, tingkat keberhasilan implementasi suatu kebijakan dipengaruhi oleh empat faktor kritis atau variabel, yaitu komunikasi, sumber daya, sikap, dan struktur birokrasi.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara umum komunikasi yang terjalin, sumber daya yang tersedia, sikap para pelaksana kebijakan, dan struktur birokrasi yang ada pada saat ini tergolong cukup baik dalam mendukung pelaksanaan peneraan meter kWh oleh Perusahaan Pihak Ketiga, hal tersebut ditunjukkan dengan nilai skor relatif rata-rata yang diperoleh untuk keempat variabel tersebut sebesar 59,35%. Dari hasil penelitian juga terungkap bahwa secara umum sikap para pelaksana kebijakan hubungannya dengan sikap atas kesesuaian antara partisipasi Pihak Ketiga dalam proses peneraan meter kWh dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada tergolong cukup baik.

This research has two targets, the first to know level of success of policy implementation of third sector designation in executing some of verification and re-verification processes meter kWh relation with critical factors influencing him, and second to know according to the policy with existing law and regulation. According to Edwards III, level of success of implementation a policy influenced by four critical factor or variable, that is communications, resource, attitude, and bureaucracy structure.
Result of research indicate that in general communications which intertwin, available resource, attitude of executors of policy, and bureaucracy structure which there is at the moment pertained good enough in supporting execution of verification of meter kWh by the Third Sector. The mentioned shown with score value relative mean obtained to be fourth of the variable equal to 59,35%. From research result is also expressed that in general attitude of the executors of policy of relation with attitude to the according to among Third Party participation in executing some of verification of meter kWh with good enough pertained existing law and regulation.
"
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia, 2005
T21566
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Universitas Indonesia, 1984
S25186
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Jakarta: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum Administrasi Negara, 2003
342.066 MEN
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Habli Robbi Taqiyya
"ABSTRAK
Skripsi ini membahas mengenai bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam menilai
hal-hal dan/atau keadaan-keadaan yang memberatkan dan meringankan pidana,
terkait penentuan berat ringannya pidana. Undang-undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2008
tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman mewajibkan hakim untuk mempertimbangkan
sifat baik dan sifat jahat dari terdakwa dalam mempertimbangkan berat ringannya
pidana. Namun hingga saat ini belum ada pengaturan yang jelas mengenai
pedoman pemidanaan bagi hakim terkait hal-hal dan/atau keadaan-keadaan yang
wajib dipertimbangkan dalam penentuan berat ringannya pidana tersebut.
Pedoman pemidanaan ini sangat penting untuk mengurangi subjektifitas hakim
dalam menilai hal-hal dan/atau keadaan yang meringankan dan memberatkan
pidana, sehingga dapat mengurangi disparitas pemidanaan. Dalam skripsi juga
dianalisa putusan hakim dalam perkara Adiguna Sutowo, terkait pertimbangan
hakim dalam putusan ini terhadap adanya perdamaian diluar sidang pengadilan
sebagai alasan yang meringankan pidana.

ABSTRACT
The Focus of this study is concerning the consideration of Judge in assessing
elaboration and/or any circumstance which could be a mitigation and an
incrimination of punishment, that related to the decision of punishment. Act
Number 4 year 2008 concerning Indonesia Judicial Power stipulates the duties of
judge to consider the behaviour of the accused to decide the final punishment.
However, up until this moment, there is no lucid regulation concerning the
guideline of punishment for judge in connection with such elaboration and/or any
circumstance that should be taken into account in deciding the punishment. The
guideline of punishment is utterly necessary to redeem the subjectivity of judge in
assessing such elaboration and/or circumstance which could be a mitigation and
an incrimination of punishment, and in the end it will defect the punishment
disparity. This study also analyzes the judge verdict in case of Adiguna Sutowo,
in which related to judge consideration about any non-litigation settlement as a
mitigation of punishment."
2009
S22585
UI - Skripsi Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2005
342.06 MOD
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1997
342.06 MOD
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Depok: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2005
342.06 HUK
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Depok: Universitas Indonesia, 2007
342.06 HUK
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
<<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   >>