ABSTRAKMinimnya penerapan konsep fair trial menyebabkan rasa keadilan dan kepastianhukum menjadi berkurang selama proses pra-ajudikasi hingga ajudikasi, terbuktimelalui Putusan No. 08/Pid.B/2013/PN-GST dengan memvonis anak denganhukuman mati. Minimnya penerapan asas fair trial menyebabkan pembuktian usiaTerdakwa menjadi tidak diperhatikan sehingga asas admisibilitas dan asas hukumacara lainnya dihilangkan, termasuk asas in dubio pro reo. Hakim menjadi kuncidalam vonis mati terdakwa karena integrasi penyidikan hingga pembuktian yangmenjadi akar putusan Majelis Hakim. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridisnormatif. Berkenaan dengan permasalahan putusan ini, ditemukan suatu prosesatas penyidikan dan penuntutan terkait usia terdakwa tanpa identitas resmi.

---

ABSTRACTThe lack of implementation of the concept of fair trial led to a sense of justice andlegal certainty to be reduced during the pre-adjudication until the ajudication, asevidenced by Decision No. 08 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN-GST with children sentenced tothe death penalty. The lack of a fair trial application of the principle causes ofproof of age defendant be noted that the principle of admissibility and legalprinciples other events omitted, including in dubio pro reo principle. Judgesbecame a key defendant in a death sentence for the integration of the investigationuntil evidence at the root of the decision of the judges. This research wasconducted by the method of juridical normative. With regard to the issue of thisdecision, discovered a process on the investigation and prosecution of age-relateddefendants without official identity.;